Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Not all patients want to participate in decision making

A national study of public preferences

  • Clinical Review
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine calls for physicians to engage patients in making clinical decisions, but not every patient may want the same level of participation.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess public preferences for participation in decision making in a representative sample of the U.S. population. 2) To understand how demographic variables and health status influence people’s preferences for participation in decision making.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based survey of a fully representative sample of English-speaking adults was conducted in concert with the 2002 General Social Survey (N=2,765). Respondents expressed preferences ranging from patient-directed to physician-directed styles on each of 3 aspects of decision making (seeking information, discussing options, making the final decision). Logistic regression was used to assess the relationships of demographic variables and health status to preferences.

MAIN RESULTS: Nearly all respondents (96%) preferred to be offered choices and to be asked their opinions. In contrast, half of the respondents (52%) preferred to leave final decisions to their physicians and 44% preferred to rely on physicians for medical knowledge rather than seeking out information themselves. Women, more educated, and healthier people were more likely to prefer an active role in decision making. African-American and Hispanic respondents were more likely to prefer that physicians make the decisions. Preferences for an active role increased with age up to 45 years, but then declined.

CONCLUSION: This population-based study demonstrates that people vary substantially in their preferences for participation in decision making. Physicians and health care organizations should not assume that patients wish to participate in clinical decision making, but must assess individual patient preferences and tailor care accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Improving the 21st Century Healthcare System. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Healthcare System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles B. Do patients want to participate in medical decision-making? JAMA. 1984;252:2990–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:329–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles CA, Whelan T, Gafni A, Willan A, Farrell S. Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians? J Gen Clin Oncol. 2003;21:932–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charles CA, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frosch D, Kaplan R. Shared decision-making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:285–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahler H, Kulik J. Health care involvement preferences and social-emotional recovery of male coronary artery bypass patients. Health Psychol. 1991;10:399–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27(suppl 3):S110-S127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Waterworth S, Luker K. Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning care? J Adv Nurs. 1990;15:423–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson A, Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision-making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(suppl i):34–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deber R. Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: Decision-making, problem solving and the desire to participate. Can Med Assoc J. 1994;151:423–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deber R. Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. Can Med Assoc J. 1994;151:171–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Blanchard C, Labrecque M, Ruckdeschel J. Information and decision making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27:1139–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Quill TE. Partnership in patient care: a contractual approach. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:228–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Faden R, Becker C, Lewis C, Freeman J, Faden A. Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care. 1981;19:718–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cassileth B, Zupris R, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:832–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Louis Harris & Associates. Views of Informed Consent and Decision-making: Parallel Surveys of Physicians and the Public. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Making Health Care Decisions. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1982:17–316.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Young G, Materko M, Desai K. Patient satisfaction with hospital care. Med Care. 2000;38:325–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deber R, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision-making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Roger W, Ware JE. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krupat E, Putman S, Yaeger C. The fit between doctor and patients: can it be measured? J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(suppl):134.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krupat E, Hiam C, Fleming M, Freeman P. Patient-centeredness and its correlates among first year medical students. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1999;29:347–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krupat E, Rosenkranz S, Yeager C, Barnard K, Putnam S, Inui T. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:49–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R. Patient role orientation, doctor-patient fit, and visit satisfaction. Psychol Health. 2000;15:707–19.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R. When physicians and patients think alike: patient centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:1057–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davis JA, Smith TW, Marsden PV. Appendix A: Sampling Design and Weighting. General Social Surveys, 1972–2000: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nayfield S, Bongiovanni G, Alcioti M, Fischer R, Bergner L. Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:1202–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nattinger AB, Hoffman R, Shapiro R, Gottlieb M, Goodwin J. The effect of legislative requirements on the use of breast-conserving surgery. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stiggelbout A, Kiebert G. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making. Can Med Assoc J. 1997;157:383–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication. A meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288:756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC, van Engen ML. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:569–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Elderkin-Thompson V, Waitzin H. Differences in clinical communication by gender. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:112–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pandey S, Hart J, Tiwary S. Women’s health and the Internet: understanding emerging trends and implications. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:179–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mazur D, Hickman D. Patients’ preference for risk disclosure and role in the decision-making for invasive medical procedures. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:114–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ayanian J, Cleary P, Weissman J, Epstein A. The effects of race of patients’ preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1661–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Einbinder L, Schulman K. The effect of race on the referral process for invasive cardiac procedures. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57(suppl):162–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hannan E, van Ryn M, Burke J, et al. Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery. Med Care. 1999;37:68–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Maynard C, Fisher LD, Passamani ER, Pullum T. Black patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): race and clinical decision making. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1446–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Etchason J, Armour B, Ofli E, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2001;285:883.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fiscelle K, Franks P, Gold M, Clancy C. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000;283:2579–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Epstein A, Taylor W, Seage G. Effects of patients’ socioeconomic status and physicians’ training and practice on patient-doctor communication. Am J Prev Med. 1995;78:101–6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. van Ryn M. Research on the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in medical care. Med Care. 2002;40(suppl):I-140–I-151.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schulman K, Berlin J, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–26. Erratum: N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender and partnership in the patient relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosen P, Anell A, Hjortsberg C. Patient views on choice and participation in primary health care. Health Policy. 2001;55:121–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Catalan J, Brener N, Andrews H, et al. Whose health is it? Views about decision-making and information-seeking from people with HIV infection and their professional careers. AIDS Care. 1994;6:349–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Inglehart R. Post-materialist in an environment of insecurity. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1981;75:880–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Beisecker A. Aging and the desire for information and input in medical decisions: patient consumerism in medical encounters. Gerontologist. 1988;28:330–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Degner L, Sloan J. Decision-making. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Greenfield S, Kaplan R, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patient’s participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:448–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Rost K, Flavin K, Cole K. Change in metabolic control and function status after hospitalization: impact of patient activation intervention in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:881–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ashcroft J, Leinster S, Slade P. Mastectomy vs breast conservation: psychological effects of patient choice of treatment. In: Watson M, Creer S, eds. Psychological Issues in Malignant Diseases. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1986:55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fallowfield L, Hall A, Maguire P, Baum M, A’Hern R. Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. BMJ. 1994;309:448.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Brody D. The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:718–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mendonca P, Brehm S. Effects of choice on behavioural treatment of overweight children. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1983;1:343–58.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Arora N, McHorney C. Patient preferences for medical decision-making: who really wants to participate? Med Care. 2000;38:325–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz M. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision-making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Levinson MD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

The study was funded by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, grant RO1HS09982.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A. et al. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 531–535 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x

Key Words

Navigation