Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients receiving antihypertensive therapy

Abstract

Larger variability of office blood pressure (BP) was reportedly associated with a higher risk of stroke or mortality from all causes. In the present study, we focused on the relationship of variability of office BP and occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (MI). We registered 139 patients receiving antihypertensive therapy for more than 1 year who experienced first-ever episode of MI at the age of 60 years or over. At least two sex- and age-matched (±5 years) control patients were registered for every MI patient. Average systolic and diastolic BP during the 12-month period prior to the occurrence of MI, or the time of registration in the case of control patients, was similar in both patient groups. The office BP variability was evaluated by calculating the variation coefficient (VC) of BP. VC of diastolic BP was significantly higher in the MI patients (10.0 ± 4.0%) compared with the control patients (8.8 ± 3.4%). VC of systolic BP was not different between the MI and the control patients. Multiple logistic analysis revealed the relationship of the VC for office diastolic BP to the occurrence of MI was significant after adjustment for BP level, age, gender, body mass index, serum total cholesterol concentrations, diabetes mellitus, and current smoking. In conclusion, larger long-term variability of office diastolic BP during antihypertensive therapy is a predictor of MI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacMahon S, Neal B, Rodgers A . Blood pressure lowering for the primary and secondary prevention of coronary and cerebrovascular disease Schweiz Med Wochensch 1995 125: 2479–2486

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Frattola A et al. Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variability J Hypertens 1993 11: 1133–1137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Otsuka K, Cornélissen G, Halberg F, Oehlerts G . Excessive circadian amplitude of blood pressure increases risk of ischemic stroke and nephropathy J Med Eng Technol 1997 21: 23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kario K et al. Nocturnal fall of blood pressure and silent cerebrovascular damage in elderly hypertensivepatients. Advanced silent cerebrovascular damage in extreme dippers Hypertension 1996 27: 130–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Watanabe N et al. Nocturnal blood pressure and silent cerebrovascular lesions in elderly Japanese Stroke 1996 27: 1319–1327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuwajima I et al. Cardiac implications of the morning surge in blood pressure in elderly hypertensivepatients: relation to arising time Am J Hypertens 1995 8: 8 9 29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hata Y et al. Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of brain infarction in elderly hypertensivepatients Hypertens Res 2000 23: 553–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tozawa M, Iseki K, Yoshi S, Fukiyama K . Blood pressure variability as an adverse prognostic risk factor in end-stage renal disease Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999 14: 1976–1981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuomilehto J, Kuulasmaa K . WHO MONICA Project: assessing CHD mortality and morbidity Int J Epidemiol 1989 18: S38–S45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. Diabetes Mellitus: Report of a WHO Study Group World Health Organization, Geneva 1985. WHO Technical Report Series No. 727

  11. Iseki K, Ikemiya Y, Fukiyama K . Risk factors of end-stage renal disease and serum creatinine in a community-based mass screening Kidney Int 1997 51: 850–854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. SAS/STAT, User's Guide. Release 6.03 Edition SAS Institute Inc, Cary 1988

  13. Verdecchia P et al. Prognostic significance of blood pressure variability in essential hypertension. Univariate and multivariate assessment Blood Press Monit 1996 1: 3–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Floras JS et al. Consequences of impaired arterial baroreflexes in essential hypertension: effects on pressor responses, plasma noradrenaline and blood pressure variability J Hypertens 1988 6: 525–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Takeda Medical Research Foundation. Part of this paper was presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, Tokyo, October, 1997, and at the 14th Scientific Meeting of American Society of Hypertension, New York, May 1999.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hata, Y., Muratani, H., Kimura, Y. et al. Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. J Hum Hypertens 16, 141–146 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001301

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001301

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links