Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 169, Issue 6, June 2015, Pages 767-774.e2
American Heart Journal

Trial Design
Rationale and design of a cluster-randomized multifaceted intervention trial to improve stroke care quality in China: The GOLDEN BRIDGE–Acute Ischemic Stroke

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.008Get rights and content

Background

Prior studies have demonstrated a significant gap between guideline-based recommendations and clinical practice in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in China.

Aims

This study implements a targeted multifaceted quality improvement intervention in AIS patients and identifies the feasibility and efficacy of this intervention.

Design

This is a multicenter, 2-arm, open-label, cluster-randomized trial involving 40 clusters (hospitals) from China National Network of Stroke Research. Hospitals are randomized to receive a targeted multifaceted quality improvement intervention (experimental group) or routine standard of care (control group). The multifaceted intervention includes an evidence-based clinical pathway, written care protocols, a quality coordinator, and a monitoring and feedback system of performance measures. The number of enrolled patients in the trial will be 4,800. Primary outcome is the measure of the adherence to AIS evidence-based performance measures including the composite measure (defined as the total number of interventions performed among eligible patients divided by the total number of possible interventions among eligible patients) and the all-or-none measure (defined as the proportion of eligible patients who receive all of the performance measure interventions for which they are eligible). Secondary patient outcomes include inhospital death; a new vascular event; disability; and all-cause death at 3, 6, and 12 months after initial symptom onset. All analyses will be performed according to the intention-to-treatment principle and accounted for clustering using generalized estimating equations.

Conclusions

If proven effective, this targeted multifaceted intervention model will be extended nationwide as a model to bridge the evidence-based gap in the AIS management in China.

Section snippets

Study aim

The aim is to evaluate whether a multifaceted quality improvement intervention will improve the adherence to individual, composite, and all-or-none measures for patients with AIS presenting within the first 7 days from stroke symptom onset and reduce the incidence of inhospital death; a new vascular event; disability; and all-cause death at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial symptom onset.

Design

Golden Bridge–AIS is a multicenter, 2-arm, open-label, parallel, cluster-randomized, controlled trial

Discussion

Stroke registries aim to track delivery of care to hospitalized stroke patients as well as guide and monitor improvements in the quality of stroke care. This strategy has been proven effective and sustainable.30, 31 The Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)–Stroke program was developed as a national stroke quality improvement initiative to substantially address the treatment gap of AIS in United States.32 Although there have been substantial improvements in stroke care over time, as it was not a

Disclosures

Competing interest: All authors report no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article except as follows:

Dr Schwamm is the chair of the GWTG-Stroke Clinical Workgroup (unpaid) and serves as a stroke system of care consultant to the Joint Commission, Center for Disease Control, and Massachusetts Department of Public Health. He is the primary investigator of a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–funded clinical trial of extended window thrombolysis for which

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating hospitals, their physicians and nurses, and the GOLDEN BRIDGE–AIS Steering Committee members.

References (34)

  • M. Dennis et al.

    Effectiveness of thigh-length graduated compression stockings to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis after stroke (CLOTS trial 1): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • C. Mazzone et al.

    Physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis in stroke

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2004)
  • M.K. Gould et al.

    Low-molecular-weight heparins compared with unfractionated heparin for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

    Ann Intern Med

    (1999)
  • D.J. Ramsey et al.

    Early assessments of dysphagia and aspiration risk in acute stroke patients

    Stroke

    (2003)
  • L. Perry et al.

    Screening for dysphagia and aspiration in acute stroke: a systematic review

    Dysphagia

    (2001)
  • P. Amarenco et al.

    High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • W.J. Wang et al.

    Clinical characteristics, management, and functional outcomes in Chinese patients within the first year after intracerebral hemorrhage: analysis from China National Stroke Registry

    CNS Neurosci Ther

    (2012)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Quantifying regional variations in components of acute stroke unit (ASU) care in the international HeadPoST study

      2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Underlying barriers for thrombolysis in Asia include delayed presentation from the onset of symptoms, concerns over harm, inexperience, and high cost of thrombolysis treatment when there is no health insurance coverage [31,34,35]. Although ASU care is defined as multidisciplinary and a Level I guideline recommendation, early rehabilitation is less common in China and India/Sri Lanka, and many other resource settings in LMICs, in part due to limited availability of allied healthcare professionals and ethnic/cultural differences in the understanding of ‘passive’ and ‘active’ rehabilitation [11,33,36,37]. Additionally, compared to AU/UK, the recommendation for assessment by a speech pathologist and assisted feeding is explicit stroke management guidelines in China and India [38,39], which also influences their implementation into practice [40].

    • Effect on thromboprophylaxis among hospitalized patients using a system-wide multifaceted quality improvement intervention: Rationale and design for a multicenter cluster randomized clinical trial in China: CHIPS-VTE Study for Thromboprophylaxis

      2020, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this multicenter cluster randomization trial, intervention is applied at hospital level. Written consent will be obtained from directors at hospital level with agreement for participation and randomization, avoiding selection bias potentially induced by differences in consent refusal between hospitals.27-29 QI intervention is supposed to be beneficial in HA-VTE prevention among hospitalized patients through effective implementation of recommended prophylaxis.

    • An international cluster-randomized quality improvement trial to increase the adherence to evidence-based therapies for acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: Rationale and design of the BRIDGE STROKE Trial

      2019, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, the multilevel and multifaceted educational intervention proposed by the IMPACT trial, conducted in 48 centers from Argentina, Brazil, China, India, and Romania, resulted in a 9.1% difference in the use of oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation patients between intervention and control groups after 12 months.36 Recently, the Golden Bridge Study, aiming to improve the quality of care for AIS patients in China, also showed a 3.54% absolute increase in the use of evidence-based therapies.29,35 To the best of our knowledge, BRIDGE Stroke represents the first international cluster-randomized trial developed in Latin American countries and evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention on the composite adherence score (comprising the multidisciplinary nature of stroke care), “all or none” measures, and clinical outcomes in patients with AIS or TIA.

    • Achieving best outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease in China by enhancing the quality of medical care and establishing a learning ealth-care system

      2015, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      The CPACS group identified barriers to implementation of the clinical pathway,64 including absence of leadership support, variation in the capacity for care, and health-care funding constraints, and provided instructions for relevant efforts in the future. Several other studies are in progress and will provide further insights into quality improvement strategies for cardiovascular care.65,66 In addition to the need to better apply existing knowledge, China urgently needs to expand the evidence for what treatment strategy works best for which subgroup of patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Randomized controlled trial number NCT02212912.

    C Michael Gibson, MS, MD served as guest editor for this article.

    Author contributions: Yongjun Wang, Eric D Peterson, Sidney C Smith, Lee H Schwamm, Gregg C Fonarow, David Wang, Janet Prvu Bettger, Ying Xian, Yilong Wang, and Xingquan Zhao: original idea, the trial design, and manuscript reviews. Chunxue Wang, Liping Liu, Zixiao Li, and Chunjuan Wang: the trial design, literature review, manuscript drafting, and updating. Hao Li, Haipeng Shen, and Yuesong Pan: statistical method drafting.

    This study is supported by the grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2011BAI08B02, 2012ZX09303, and 2013BAI09B03), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders (BIBD-PXM2013_014226_07_000084). This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02212912).

    n

    These 2 authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

    View full text