Skip to main content
Log in

Review of Stroke Center Effectiveness and Other Get with the Guidelines Data

  • Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke (D Leifer and JE Safdieh, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A stroke system of care comprises a comprehensive, diverse, longitudinal system that addresses all aspects of stroke care in a coordinated manner. It includes the spectrum of stroke care from primary prevention to activation of emergency medical services, acute care, secondary prevention, rehabilitation and return to the community. Acute care for stroke can be initiated in acute stroke ready hospitals with subsequent transfer to either primary or comprehensive stroke centers. The attributes of an effective stroke system of care include coordinated care, customized to the local environment, able to make the best use of the resources available and that respects and maintains traditions of excellence. Care processes for patients with stroke can be improved through participation in certification and recognition programs such as the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program. The final aim of stroke systems should be to integrate prevention and treatment and promote patient access to the best evidence-based care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:933–44. This article provides evidence of the substantial increase in the prevalence and costs of cerebrovascular diseases and suggests that effective prevention strategies are needed in order to limit the growing burden of cerebrovascular diseases.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas VC, Tong DC, Gillum LA, et al. Do the brain attack coalition’s criteria for stroke centers improve care for ischemic stroke? Neurology. 2005;64:422–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. • Meretoja A, Roine RO, Kaste M, et al. Effectiveness of primary and comprehensive stroke centers: perfect stroke: a nationwide observational study from Finland. Stroke. 2010;41:1102–7. In this observational register–linkage study of all patients with ischemic stroke treated in Finland between 1999 and 2006, a clear association between the level of acute stroke care and patient outcome was demonstrated, supporting the use of published criteria for PSCs and CSCs.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xian Y, Holloway RG, Chan PS, et al. Association between stroke center hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke and mortality. JAMA. 2011;305:373–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwamm LH, Pancioli A, Acker 3rd JE, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: recommendations from the American Stroke Association’s task force on the development of stroke systems. Circulation. 2005;111:1078–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alberts MJ, Latchaw RE, Jagoda A, et al. Revised and updated recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers: a summary statement from the brain attack coalition. Stroke. 2011;42:2651–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wein TH, Staub L, Felberg R, et al. Activation of emergency medical services for acute stroke in a nonurban population: the T.L.L. Temple Foundation Stroke Project. Stroke. 2000;31:1925–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Potvin JH. Emergency medical services in stroke care: a Rhode Island perspective. Med Health R I. 2011;94:353–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. • McKinney JS, Mylavarapu K, Lane J, et al. Hospital prenotification of stroke patients by emergency medical services improves stroke time targets. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:113–8. This article demonstrates that prehospital notification of suspected stroke patients reduced the time to stroke team arrival, neuroimaging completion, and neuroimaging interpretation. Furthermore, intravenous thrombolysis occurred twice as often in the prenotification group.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuster GW, Bueno Alves M, Cendoroglo Neto M, et al. Determinants of emergency medical services use in a Brazilian population with acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:244–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdullah AR, Smith EE, Biddinger PD, et al. Advance hospital notification by EMS in acute stroke is associated with shorter door-to-computed tomography time and increased likelihood of administration of tissue-plasminogen activator. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12:426–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber JE, Ebinger M, Rozanski M, et al. Prehospital thrombolysis in acute stroke: results of the PHANTOM-S pilot study. Neurology. 2013;80:163–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel MD, Rose KM, O’Brien EC, et al. Prehospital notification by emergency medical services reduces delays in stroke evaluation: findings from the North Carolina Stroke Care Collaborative. Stroke. 2011;42:2263–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams Jr HP, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, et al. Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS). Stroke. 2000;31:71–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, et al. Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:373–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Alberts MJ, Hademenos G, Latchaw RE, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. Brain Attack Coalition. JAMA. 2000;283:3102–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaudhry FS, Schneck MJ, Warady J, et al. Primary stroke center concept: strengths and limitations. Front Neurol. 2012;3:108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pedigo AS, Odoi A. Investigation of disparities in geographic accessibility to emergency stroke and myocardial infarction care in east Tennessee using geographic information systems and network analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20:924–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stradling D, Yu W, Langdorf ML, et al. Stroke care delivery before vs after JCAHO stroke center certification. Neurology. 2007;68:469–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lichtman JH, Allen NB, Wang Y, et al. Stroke patient outcomes in US hospitals before the start of the Joint Commission Primary Stroke Center certification program. Stroke. 2009;40:3574–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alberts MJ, Latchaw RE, Selman WR, et al. Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a consensus statement from the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke. 2005;36:1597–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors 3rd JJ, et al. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:849–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grigoryan M, Chaudhry SA, Hassan AE, et al. Neurointerventional procedural volume per hospital in United States: implications for comprehensive stroke center designation. Stroke. 2012;43:1309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Demaerschalk BM, Hwang HM, Leung G. Cost analysis review of stroke centers, telestroke, and rt-PA. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:537–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Silva GS, Schwamm LH. Use of telemedicine and other strategies to increase the number of patients that may be treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012;12:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guzauskas GF, Boudreau DM, Villa KF, et al. The cost-effectiveness of primary stroke centers for acute stroke care. Stroke. 2012;43:1617–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fonarow GC, Gregory T, Driskill M, et al. Hospital certification for optimizing cardiovascular disease and stroke quality of care and outcomes. Circulation. 2010;122:2459–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones DW, Peterson ED, Bonow RO, et al. Translating research into practice for healthcare providers: the American Heart Association’s strategy for building healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Circulation. 2008;118:687–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roberts JS, Coale JG, Redman RR. A history of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. JAMA. 1987;258:936–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Heidenreich PA, Lewis WR, LaBresh KA, et al. Hospital performance recognition with the Get With The Guidelines program and mortality for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Am Heart J. 2009;158:546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith EE, Liang L, Hernandez A, et al. Influence of stroke subtype on quality of care in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program. Neurology. 2009;73:709–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. LaBresh KA, Reeves MJ, Frankel MR, et al. Hospital treatment of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack using the “Get With The Guidelines” program. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:411–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hollenbeak CS, Gorton CP, Tabak YP, et al. Reductions in mortality associated with intensive public reporting of hospital outcomes. Am J Med Qual. 2008;23:279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saposnik G, Estol CJ. Translational research: from observational studies to health policy: how a cohort study can help improve outcomes after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:3336–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, et al. Get With the Guidelines-Stroke is associated with sustained improvement in care for patients hospitalized with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circulation. 2009;119:107–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, et al. Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association’s Target: stroke initiative. Stroke. 2011;42:2983–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwamm L, Fayad P, Acker 3rd JE, et al. Translating evidence into practice: a decade of efforts by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association to reduce death and disability due to stroke: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2010;41:1051–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lin CB, Peterson ED, Smith EE, et al. Patterns, predictors, variations, and temporal trends in emergency medical service hospital prenotification for acute ischemic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ekundayo OJ, Saver JL, Fonarow GC, et al. Patterns of emergency medical services use and its association with timely stroke treatment. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:212–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tong D, Reeves MJ, Hernandez AF, et al. Times from symptom onset to hospital arrival in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke program 2002 to 2009: temporal trends and implications. Stroke. 2012;43:1912–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, et al. Timeliness of tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy in acute ischemic stroke: patient characteristics, hospital factors, and outcomes associated with door-to-needle times within 60 minutes. Circulation. 2011;123:750–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2013;309:2480–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kelly AG, Hellkamp AS, Olson D, et al. Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program. Stroke. 2012;43:1279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Masrur S, Smith EE, Saver JL, et al. Dysphagia screening and hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients with acute ischemic stroke: findings from Get with the Guidelines-Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.11.013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lewis WR, Fonarow GC, Grau-Sepulveda MV, et al. Improvement in use of anticoagulation therapy in patients with ischemic stroke: results from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke. Am Heart J. 2011;162:692–9e.2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lewis WR, Fonarow GC, LaBresh KA, et al. Differential use of warfarin for secondary stroke prevention in patients with various types of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Allen NB, Kaltenbach L, Goldstein LB, et al. Regional variation in recommended treatments for ischemic stroke and TIA: Get With The Guidelines–Stroke 2003–2010. Stroke. 2012;43:1858–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Smith EE, Shobha N, Dai D, et al. A risk score for in-hospital death in patients admitted with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e005207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fonarow GC, Pan W, Saver JL, et al. Comparison of 30-day mortality models for profiling hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke with vs without adjustment for stroke severity. JAMA. 2012;308:257–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Langhorne P, Dennis MS. Stroke units: the next 10 years. Lancet. 2004;363:834–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53 Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD000197.

  54. Langhorne P, de Villiers L, Pandian JD. Applicability of stroke-unit care to low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:341–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Gisele Sampaio Silva declares no conflict of interest.

Lee H. Schwamm declares no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisele Sampaio Silva.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, G.S., Schwamm, L.H. Review of Stroke Center Effectiveness and Other Get with the Guidelines Data. Curr Atheroscler Rep 15, 350 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-013-0350-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-013-0350-8

Keywords

Navigation