Table 2

Treatment effect of RAAS inhibitors on the two poor clinical grading scales of aSAH

OutcomesExposures (n)Poor outcomes, n (%)Multivariable model*
Imputed data (n=1238)Complete data (n=806)
OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
Hunt-Hess scale
(1–3 vs 4–5)
Non-RAAS inhibitors (948)158 (16.7)ReferenceReference
RAAS inhibitors (290)43 (14.8)0.653 (0.430 to 0.992)0.0460.558 (0.340 to 0.918)0.022
WFNS scale
(1–3 vs 4–5)
Non-RAAS inhibitors (948)298 (31.4)ReferenceReference
RAAS inhibitors (290)84 (29.0)0.656 (0.469 to 0.918)0.0140.587 (0.391 to 0.882)0.010
  • *Multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, smoking status, controlled status of hypertension, number of antihypertensive medications, ischaemic stroke, preadmission use of anti-platelet medication, preadmission use of anticoagulation medications, location of the reputed aneurysm, size of the aneurysm, shape irregularity of the aneurysm and number of intracranial aneurysms.

  • aSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; WFNS, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons.