Table 1

Impact of preadmission hypertension statuses on the two poor clinical grading scales of aSAH

OutcomesExposures (n)Poor outcomes, n (%)Multivariable model*
Imputed data (n=4545)Complete data (n=2925)
OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
Hunt-Hess scale
(1–3 vs 4–5)
Non-hypertension (2586)263 (10.2)ReferenceReference
Hypertension (1959)291 (14.9)1.319 (1.093 to 1.592)0.0041.244 (0.997 to 1.553)0.053
 Controlled hypertension (554)70 (12.6)1.070 (0.800 to 1.432)0.6481.072 (0.768 to 1.495)0.683
 Uncontrolled hypertension (687)133 (19.4)1.799 (1.413 to 2.291)0.0001.666 (1.261 to 2.201)0.000
 Unmonitored hypertension (718)88 (12.3)1.100 (0.844 to 1.434)0.4790.972 (0.700 to 1.348)0.863
WFNS scale
(1–3 vs 4–5)
Non-hypertension (2586)598 (23.1)ReferenceReference
Hypertension (1959)586 (29.9)1.256 (1.092 to 1.446)0.0011.273 (1.070 to 1.513)0.006
 Controlled hypertension (554)131 (23.6)0.891 (0.713 to 1.114)0.3130.844 (0.642 to 1.110)0.224
 Uncontrolled hypertension (687)258 (37.6)1.721 (1.425 to 2.079)0.0001.907 (1.525 to 2.385)0.000
 Unmonitored hypertension (718)197 (27.4)1.175 (0.969 to 1.426)0.1011.085 (0.846 to 1.391)0.522
  • *Multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, smoking status, controlled status of hypertension, ischaemic stroke, preadmission use of anti-platelet medication, preadmission use of anticoagulation medication, location of the reputed aneurysm, size of the aneurysm, shape irregularity of the aneurysm and number of intracranial aneurysms.

  • aSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage; WFNS, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons.