Table 3

Safety outcomes in study participants treated with tenecteplase versus alteplase

EndpointsTenecteplase (n=194), n (%)Alteplase (n=184), n (%)Unadjusted risk ratio (95% CI)
Death within 90 days11 (5.7)20 (11.0)0.99 (0.96 to 1.02)*
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage5 (2.6)6 (3.3)0.79 (0.24 to 2.54)
Peripheral bleeding requiring blood transfusions0 (0)0 (0)NA
Orolingual angioedema1 (0.5)1 (0.5)0.94 (0.06 to 15.05)
Other17 (8.8)17 (9.2)0.94 (0.49 to 1.80)
Imaging-identified haemorrhage23 (11.9)27 (14.7)0.80 (0.48 to 1.35)
Subarachnoid haemorrhage5 (2.6)4 (2.2)1.18 (0.32 to 4.34)
Subdural haemorrhage0 (0)1 (0.5)NA
Intraventricular haemorrhage5 (2.6)3 (1.6)1.58 (0.38 to 6.52)
HI1 (scattered small petechiae)1 (0.5)5 (2.7)0.18 (0.02 to 1.59)
HI2 (confluent petechiae)12 (6.2)13 (7.1)0.86 (0.40 to 1.84)
PH1 (haematoma occupying <30% of infarct with no substantive mass effect)†6 (3.1)3 (1.6)1.87 (0.47 to 7.39)
PH2 (haematoma occupying ≥30% of infarct with obvious mass effect)‡2 (1)3 (1.6)0.62 (0.10 to 3.70)
  • Imaging-identified intracranial haemorrhages were assessed in a central core laboratory in a blinded manner and classified using the Heidelberg classification.

  • *HR using Cox proportional hazard adjusted for age, sex and occlusion site.

  • †Remote PH type 1 was defined as haematoma outside the infarcted tissue with no substantive mass effect.

  • ‡Remote PH type 2 was defined as haematoma outside the infarcted tissue, with obvious mass effect.

  • HI, haemorrhagic infarction; NA, not applicable; PH, parenchymal haematoma.