Article Text
Abstract
Background Hypertension is widely acknowledged as a significant contributory factor to the heightened risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture. Nevertheless, the impact of hypertension management on the outcomes subsequent to aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH), particularly concerning the severity of aSAH, remains an underexplored area.
Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from a prospectively multicentre cohort of 4545 patients with aSAH in China. Premorbid hypertension status and the utilisation of antihypertensive medications prior to admission were set as key exposure factors. The primary outcomes encompassed unfavourable clinical grading scales observed on admission. Employing multivariable logistic regression, we explored the association between premorbid hypertension status, preadmission use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and unfavourable clinical grading scales.
Results In comparison to patients with normal blood pressure, only uncontrolled hypertension demonstrated a significant and independent association with an elevated risk of poor outcomes on the Hunt-Hess scale (OR=1.799, 95% CI 1.413 to 2.291, p<0.001) and the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale (OR=1.721, 95% CI 1.425 to 2.079, p<0.001). Furthermore, the antecedent use of RAAS inhibitors before admission was markedly and independently linked to a diminished risk of adverse outcomes on the Hunt-Hess scale (OR=0.653, 95% CI 0.430 to 0.992, p=0.046) and the WFNS scale (OR=0.656, 95% CI 0.469 to 0.918, p=0.014).
Conclusions Uncontrolled hypertension markedly elevates the risk of adverse clinical outcomes following an aSAH. Conversely, the preadmission utilisation of RAAS inhibitors demonstrates a noteworthy association with a favourable clinical outcome after aSAH.
- Intracranial Aneurysm
- Hemorrhage
- Blood Pressure
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Supplementary material
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Contributors ZLi and ZLu collected the data and performed the research. Data were analysed by PZ. PZ drafted the manuscript. SC, ZW and QH conceived and designed the research. LJ, LT, QL and QH initiated and organised this study. QH accepts full responsibility for the work and the conduct of the study as the guarantor, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding This study was funded by the National Research and Development Project of Key Chronic Diseases (Grant No. 2016YFC1300703), the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2021J011367 and No. 2021J011353), the Medical Project of Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (Grant No. 3502Z20214ZD1013), Xiamen Municipal Health Commission, Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (Grant No. 3502Z20209005), Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Brain Diseases (Grant No. 2021FJSLCYX01) and Xiamen Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (Grant No. 2021XMSLCYX01).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.