You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Clinical imaging factors of excellent outcome after thrombolysis in large-vessel stroke: a THRACE subgroup analysis
  1. Nolwenn Riou-Comte1,
  2. Benjamin Gory2,
  3. Marc Soudant3,
  4. François Zhu2,
  5. Yu Xie2,
  6. Lisa Humbertjean1,
  7. Gioia Mione1,
  8. Catherine Oppenheim4,
  9. Francis Guillemin3,
  10. Serge Bracard2,
  11. Sébastien Richard1
  12. on behalf of the THRACE investigators
  1. 1 Department of Neurology-Stroke Unit, CIC-P 1433, INSERMU1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  2. 2 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, INSERM U1254, IADI, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  3. 3 Clinical Investigation Centre-Clinical Epidemiology 1433, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  4. 4 Department of Neuroradiology, INSERM U894, Université Paris-Descartes, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France
  1. Correspondence to Professor Sébastien Richard; s.richard{at}chru-nancy.fr

Abstract

Background For patients with stroke with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), study of factors predicting response to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) would allow identifying subgroups with high expected gain, and those for whom it could be considered as futile, and even detrimental. From patients included in the Mechanical Thrombectomy After Intravenous Alteplase vs Alteplase Alone After Stroke trial, we investigated clinical-imaging factors associated with optimal response to IVT.

Methods We included patients receiving IVT alone. Excellent outcome was defined by a 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1. Clinical-imaging predictors were assessed on multivariate analysis after multiple imputations. The predictive performance of the model was assessed with the C-statistic.

Results Among 247 patients with LVO treated with IVT alone, 77 (31%) showed 3-month mRS ≤1. Predictors of 3-month mRS ≤1 were no medical history of hypertension (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.74 to 3.38; p=0.007); no current smoking (OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.79 to 4.26; p=0.02); onset-to-IVT time (OR 0.47 per hour increase; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78; p=0.003); diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) volume (OR 0.78 per 10 mL increase; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89; p=0.0004); presence of susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) (OR 7.89; 95% CI 1.65 to 37.78; p=0.01) and SVS length (OR 0.87 per mm increase; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.94; p=0.001). The prediction models showed a C-statistic=0.79 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.80).

Conclusions In patients with stroke with anterior-circulation LVO treated with IVT alone, predictors of excellent outcome at 3 months were no medical history of hypertension or current smoking, reduced onset-to-IVT time, small DWI volume, presence of SVS and short SVS length. These predictive factors could help practitioners in decision-making for IVT implementation in reperfusion strategies, all the more for the drip and ship paradigm.

Trial registration number NCT01062698.

  • stroke
  • thrombolysis
  • thrombectomy

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Only data that are relevant for the main objective of this ancillary study were available from the THRACE trial in agreement with the principal investigator of the trial. Individual de-identified participant data were shared following the explanation of the main objective and the statistical analysis. Data are available on reasonable request to SR (s.richard@chru-nancy.fr).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2020-000852

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a cornerstone in therapeutic strategies for cerebral reperfusion. It allows for early reperfusion in about one-third of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) of anterior circulation.1 While mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is mostly performed in comprehensive stroke centres with endovascular capacities, patients may have wide access to IVT treatment in developed stroke networks. Main indications and contraindications have been defined following original studies assessing IVT gain and safety.2 3 Nowadays, both are debated in practice as well as in clinical research.4 Then, identification of factors predicting optimal response to IVT or not, would help to define subgroups of patients with LVO for whom high gain is expected or, on the contrary, those with an overriding haemorrhagic risk.

    Most studies have explored the association between isolated imaging criteria or clinical findings and response to IVT.5 6 Most prediction models for stroke outcome were developed without considering a revascularisation strategy and without identifying patients with LVO as a poor prognosis subgroup.7

    From the major trial Mechanical Thrombectomy After Intravenous Alteplase vs Alteplase Alone After Stroke (THRACE),8 we sought to determine the clinical and imaging predictors of 3-month excellent outcome after IVT alone in patients with anterior-circulation LVO and to evaluate the predictive performance of early neurological improvement to anticipate this successful response to treatment.

    Methods

    Study population

    The study was a subgroup analysis of the randomised controlled THRACE trial study.8 Patients with LVO of the anterior circulation treated with IVT only were included in the present analysis.

    Outcome

    The primary end point was 3-month excellent outcome after IVT alone, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–1 at 3 months.

    Clinical and imaging characteristics

    Demographic characteristics (age, sex, vascular risk factors and comorbidities), baseline examination data (blood pressure, heart rate, US National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, glycaemia, temperature), symptom onset to IVT treatment time (OTT), clinical outcomes (24-hour NIHSS score, 3-month mRS score) and imaging characteristics (Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT (ASPECT) score, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) ischaemic volume, vascular territory of ischaemia, deep white matter hyperintensities by the FAZEKAS score, susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) or hyper-dense middle cerebral artery sign (HMCAS), SVS or HMCAS length, clot burden score (CBS), thrombus location, FLAIR vascular hyperintensities (FVH)/DWI mismatch9 and ASPECT-FVH score10) were extracted from a centralised database.

    The NIHSS score improvement from pretreatment to 24-hour examination was defined by the following criteria: (1) a normalised NIHSS score change (%)11; (2) a strong neurological improvement (SNI) defined as 24-hour NIHSS score ≤3; (3) a major neurological improvement (MNI) defined as 24-hour NIHSS score ≤1 or an improvement in NIHSS score ≥8 points; (4) a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke neurological improvement as an improvement in NIHSS score ≥4 points12; (5) NIHSS score improvement of ≥25% at 24 hours and (6) NIHSS score improvement of ≥50% at 24 hours.

    Statistical analysis

    All analyses involved using SAS/STAT V.9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). Continuous variables are described with mean±SD or median±IQR and categorical characteristics with frequency (%).

    Groups of patients presenting 3-month mRS score 0–1 vs 2–6 were compared in terms of clinical, anamnestic and radiological criteria by Student’s t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. After multiple imputation, predictors of excellent outcome after IVT alone were assessed by stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis (significance level for entry=0.2, significance level for removing=0.05), estimating ORs and 95% CIs. To account for differences between CT and MRI, the imaging methods were considered a nesting covariate for each studied imaging characteristic. Multivariate model performance was assessed by the C-statistic.

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and their 95% CIs for each definition of 24-hour neurological improvement were computed according to 3-month outcome. Associations between 24-hour NIHSS improvement and 3-month outcome were revealed by multivariable logistic regression analysis using crude ORs and after adjustment for the previous predictors of 3-month outcome as well as age, baseline NIHSS score, 24-hour ASPECT score and Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study haemorrhage classification.13 A Bonferroni correction for the inflation of the first-species risk was performed for this second analysis.

    Results

    Of the 412 patients included in the THRACE trial, 259 received IVT alone: 208 patients were randomised in the IVT group and 200 actually received IVT alone; 204 patients were randomised in the IVT/MT group and 59 did not receive MT and therefore had IVT alone. Of these 259 patients, 247 were included in our subgroup analysis after excluding 12 patients because of THRACE exclusion criteria (n=5 patients with cervical internal carotid artery occlusion or history of carotid surgery), absence of intracranial anterior circulation occlusion (n=2 basilar artery occlusion or other) and lost to follow-up (n=5 missing 3-month mRS score) (figure 1). Moreover, the 24-hour NIHSS score was available for 230/247 patients. The mean (SD) age was 63.8 (13.9) years and the male/female sex ratio 1.04. A total of 77/247 (31.2%) patients had an excellent 3-month outcome.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Flow chart. Excellent outcome was defined as a 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1. *One of the requirements for mechanical thrombectomy was the absence of neurological improvement ≥4 points between baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and NIHSS within 1 hour of IVT. ICA, internal carotid artery occlusion; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; THRACE, Mechanical Thrombectomy After Intravenous Alteplase vs Alteplase Alone After Stroke.

    Before multiple imputations, cohort description and bivariate analysis were disclosed in table 1.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Cohort description and bivariate analysis

    After multiple imputations, the bivariate analysis showed the probability of 3-month excellent outcome after IVT alone was associated with no history of hypertension (p=0.02), lower mean glycaemia level (p=0.03), lower mean NIHSS score (p=0.002) and shorter mean OTT (p=0.005) (table 2). On imaging, it was associated with smaller infarction volume on DWI (p<0.002), less often a superficial and deep middle cerebral artery infarct (p=0.02), shorter thrombus length (p=0.02 on MRI, p=0.03 on CT), more frequently M1 occlusion (p=0.005), higher CBS (p=0.005 on MRI, p=0.046 on CT) and more commonly FVH/DWI mismatch (p=0.02) (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Predictors of 3-month excellent outcome after IVT

    Multivariate analysis allowed for identifying the following factors independently associated with 3-month excellent outcome after IVT alone: no history of hypertension (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.74 to 3.38; p=0.007), no current smoking (OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.79 to 4.26; p=0.02), shorter OTT (OR 0.47 per hour increase; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78; p=0.003), smaller DWI volume (OR 0.78 per 10 mL increase; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89; p=0.0004), presence of SVS (OR 7.89; 95% CI 1.65 to 37.78; p=0.01) and reduced SVS length (OR 0.87 per mm increase; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.94; p=0.001) (table 2). The model allowed for good discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.79 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.80) and was well calibrated, with Brier score 0.16 and adjusted R2 0.31.

    The normalised NIHSS score change at 24 hours was independently associated with 3-month mRS score 0–1 (adjusted OR 1.79 per 10% increase; 95% CI 1.65 to 1.93; p<0.0001; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.93; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) (table 3). With a normalised NIHSS score change threshold set at 35.7% and a Youden Index at 0.71, sensitivity was 0.92, specificity 0.79, PPV 0.69 and NPV 0.95. To anticipate a 3-month excellent outcome, the best specificity and PPV were found with SNI (specificity=0.96; PPV=0.88), MNI (specificity=0.86; PPV=0.73) or NIHSS score improvement ≥50% (specificity=0.85; PPV=0.74) (table 3).

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Association of 24-hour neurological improvement with 3-month outcome

    Discussion

    Our study provides important information about factors associated with success with IVT alone in patients with stroke with LVO of the anterior circulation. High predictors of 3-month mRS score 0–1 after IVT alone were no medical history of hypertension, no current smoking, reduced OTT, small DWI volume, presence of SVS and short SVS length. In the context of this treatment, this excellent clinical outcome at 3 months can be strongly anticipated by the early NIHSS improvement criteria SNI, MNI and NIHSS improvement of at least 50%.

    Factors found associated with 3-month excellent outcome seemed related to time to IVT, thrombus features, effectiveness of leptomeningeal collateral arteries and the resulting seriousness of the infarction before treatment. Current smoking is known to enhance thrombotic effects with increased platelet adherence, endothelial cell damage and the consequent remodelling of parietal vessels. In patients with LVO, these mechanisms prevent the development of leptomeningeal collateral arteries supplying parenchyma.14 15 Similarly, hypertension would also compromise collateral circulation.16

    The DWI volume, presence of SVS and SVS length on MRI were the only independent imaging factors associated with the IVT response. Pretreatment infarction volume is an indicator of the seriousness of the stroke and is associated with early and long-term outcome.17 A lack of leptomeningeal collateral circulation facilitates rapid growth of the ischaemic core. However, the FVH/DWI mismatch seems not an appropriate surrogate of leptomeningeal collateral arteries, nor the ASPECT-FVH score, in predicting 3-month excellent outcome.

    Although patients with a large ischaemic core should not be systematically excluded from reperfusion therapy, they are particularly at risk of unfavourable response after IVT alone. This finding is explained in part by the seriousness of cerebral infarction before treatment restricting neurological recovery in the long term, and by absence or delayed reperfusion at the acute phase.18 19

    From the occlusion characteristics included in the CBS, SVS length emerged as the most determinant factor. This finding may explain the poor response to IVT with intracranial internal carotid artery occlusion.20 Previous studies have observed a threshold of 8 mm for thrombus length as highly predictive of IVT failure.20 Presence of SVS was associated with red blood cell-dominant thrombus and IVT effectiveness.21 OTT is also probably a predictor combining greater chance of reperfusion and lower infarction volume with early IVT instauration.22

    Another issue of this study was to predict optimal response to IVT with excellent outcome at the long term with early clinical examination after treatment. Previous studies have assessed the success of reperfusion mainly by vascular imaging.1 Early clinical improvement of patients with stroke with LVO is strongly associated with satisfactory and sustainable reperfusion.23–26 Consistently, we found a strong association between early and significant clinical improvement after IVT alone and excellent outcome at the long term. Among the different criteria of NIHSS improvement at 24 hours studied, SNI, MNI and NIHSS improvement of at least 50% to anticipate the excellent outcome showed good specificity and PPV. Nevertheless, clinical examination to assess NIHSS score in patients with LVO after IVT has to be performed as fast as possible, and must not delay MT.

    The strength of our study lies in the large sample of patients prospectively included in the randomised THRACE study, allowing for a robust analysis of predictors of 3-month excellent outcome after IVT alone. The choice of a dichotomous mRS 1 is supported by the need to increasingly refine the prediction of 3-month favourable outcome for patients who benefit from better adapted and more efficient revascularisation strategies. However, some limitations deserve to be mentioned. First, some important data—such as inflammatory and clotting parameters, or previous use of antiplatelet therapy—were not collected. The earliest NIHSS score assessment after treatment was at 24 hours in our study, but studies report that reperfusion, and consequent NIHSS improvement, occurs almost exclusively during the first 2 hours after IVT instauration. However, this estimation can be considered reliable because the patient clinical state was found quite similar between 1 and 24 hours after treatment.27 We merged data from patients mostly examined with MRI and less with CT but took into account qualitative differences between these imaging techniques in the multivariate analysis.

    Predicting the benefit of IVT for patients with LVO to achieve optimal reperfusion remains of high interest. This issue seems different following admission centre. For patients with LVO admitted in a centre without MT capability, IVT represents the first-line treatment in reperfusion strategy. Clinical and radiological criteria associated with optimal response to IVT allow identifying a patient subgroup with high probability to achieve reperfusion during transfer, before planned MT. They can be considered as arguments to help practitioners in decision-making to implement IVT in patients with initial contraindications, nowadays highly debated as elderly, medical history of cerebral haemorrhage, and demonstrated penumbra beyond the time window of 4.5 hours.4 For patients with LVO admitted in MT capable centres, bridging therapy (including IVT and MT) remains the gold standard. But, relevance of IVT is questioned following recent results from DIRECT-MT (Direct Intraarterial Thrombectomy in Order to Revascularize Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals) and DEVT (Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke) trials suggesting MT alone was not non-inferior to bridging therapy.28 29 However for patients who received IVT in DIRECT-MT, higher frequency of cerebral reperfusion was observed, despite high median OTT. More, non-inferiority was not confirmed by the SKIP trial.30 Finally, knowledge about factors predicting cerebral reperfusion achievement or failure after IVT could guide research towards new therapeutic strategies. Clinical improvement with reduction of haemorrhagic risk have been reported with alteplase doses lower than the 0.9 mg/kg standard dose, suggesting possible dosage adjustment following patient and stroke characteristics.31 On the contrary, subgroup of patients with low probability of reperfusion could be candidate to alternative or additional thrombolytics to alteplase. In this way, the EXTEND-IA TNK (Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke) trial observed a higher rate of reperfusion in patients with LVO after infusion with tenecteplase than alteplase before MT.32 Safety of glenzocimab, in addition to alteplase at the acute phase of cerebral infarction, is currently assessed.33

    Conclusions

    Predictors of success with IVT alone in LVO stroke are no medical history of hypertension, no current smoking, reduced OTT, small DWI volume, presence of SVS and short SVS length. These predictors may contribute to identifying patients with high probability to achieve optimal cerebral reperfusion after IVT, and help decision-making in therapeutic strategy. This hypothesis and inherent 3-month excellent outcome can strongly be anticipated by early and significant improvement of the NIHSS score.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available on reasonable request. Only data that are relevant for the main objective of this ancillary study were available from the THRACE trial in agreement with the principal investigator of the trial. Individual de-identified participant data were shared following the explanation of the main objective and the statistical analysis. Data are available on reasonable request to SR (s.richard@chru-nancy.fr).

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    The study is a subgroup analysis of the THRACE trial having received the required legal approval from the “Comité de Protection des Personnes III”, Nord Est Ethics Committee, and the research boards of the participating centres with 2009-A00753-54. All patients or their legal representatives provided written informed consent.

    References

    1. ↵
      2. Seners P ,
      3. Turc G ,
      4. Maïer B
      . Incidence and predictors of early recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2016;47:2409–12.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014181 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27462117
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group
      . Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–8.doi:10.1056/NEJM199512143332401 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7477192
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      2. Hacke W ,
      3. Kaste M ,
      4. Bluhmki E , et al
      . Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317–29.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0804656 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18815396
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      2. Berge E ,
      3. Whiteley W ,
      4. Audebert H , et al
      . European stroke organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J 2021;6:I–LXII.doi:10.1177/2396987321989865 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817340
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      2. Turc G ,
      3. Apoil M ,
      4. Naggara O , et al
      . Magnetic resonance Imaging-DRAGON score: 3-month outcome prediction after intravenous thrombolysis for anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2013;44:1323–8.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000127 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482603
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      2. Baek JH ,
      3. Kim K ,
      4. Lee Y-B , et al
      . Predicting stroke outcome using clinical- versus imaging-based scoring system. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:642–8.doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.10.009 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25576347
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      2. Hernández-Pérez M ,
      3. Pérez de la Ossa N ,
      4. Aleu A , et al
      . Natural history of acute stroke due to occlusion of the middle cerebral artery and intracranial internal carotid artery. J Neuroimaging 2014;24:354–8.doi:10.1111/jon.12062 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24251821
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      2. Bracard S ,
      3. Ducrocq X ,
      4. Mas JL , et al
      . Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1138–47.doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27567239
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      2. Legrand L ,
      3. Tisserand M ,
      4. Turc G , et al
      . Fluid-Attenuated inversion recovery vascular Hyperintensities-Diffusion-Weighted imaging mismatch identifies acute stroke patients most likely to benefit from recanalization. Stroke 2016;47:424–7.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010999 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732567
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      2. Nave AH ,
      3. Kufner A ,
      4. Bücke P , et al
      . Hyperintense vessels, collateralization, and functional outcome in patients with stroke receiving endovascular treatment. Stroke 2018;49:675–81.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019588 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29459394
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      2. Balucani C ,
      3. Levine SR ,
      4. Khoury JC , et al
      . Acute ischemic stroke with very early clinical improvement: a national Institute of neurological disorders and stroke recombinant tissue plasminogen activator stroke trials exploratory analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:894–901.doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.10.028 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825352
      OpenUrlPubMed
    12. ↵
      2. Grotta JC ,
      3. Welch KM ,
      4. Fagan SC , et al
      . Clinical deterioration following improvement in the NINDS rt-PA stroke trial. Stroke 2001;32:661–8.doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.3.661 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11239184
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      2. Wahlgren N ,
      3. Ahmed N ,
      4. Dávalos A , et al
      . Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the safe implementation of thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 2007;369:275–82.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17258667
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      2. Shuaib A ,
      3. Butcher K ,
      4. Mohammad AA , et al
      . Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:909–21.doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70195-8 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21939900
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      2. Béjot Y ,
      3. Jacquin A ,
      4. Daubail B , et al
      . Smoking status and severity of ischemic stroke. A population-based study. Eur Neurol 2014;71:59–64.doi:10.1159/000355021 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24334964
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      2. Chan S-L ,
      3. Sweet JG ,
      4. Bishop N , et al
      . Pial collateral reactivity during hypertension and aging: understanding the function of collaterals for stroke therapy. Stroke 2016;47:1618–25.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013392 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103017
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      2. Barrett KM ,
      3. Ding YH ,
      4. Wagner DP , et al
      . Change in diffusion-weighted imaging infarct volume predicts neurologic outcome at 90 days: results of the acute stroke accurate prediction (ASAP) trial serial imaging substudy. Stroke 2009;40:2422–7.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548933 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19443798
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      2. Gautheron V ,
      3. Xie Y ,
      4. Tisserand M , et al
      . Outcome after reperfusion therapies in patients with large baseline diffusion-weighted imaging stroke lesions: a THRACE trial (mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke) subgroup analysis. Stroke 2018;49:750–3.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020244 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382803
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      2. Humpich M ,
      3. Singer OC ,
      4. du Mesnil de Rochemont R , et al
      . Effect of early and delayed recanalization on infarct pattern in proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;22:51–6.doi:10.1159/000092338 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16567938
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      2. Riedel CH ,
      3. Zimmermann P ,
      4. Jensen-Kondering U , et al
      . The importance of size: successful recanalization by intravenous thrombolysis in acute anterior stroke depends on thrombus length. Stroke 2011;42:1775–7.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609693 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474810
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      2. Choi MH ,
      3. Park GH ,
      4. Lee JS , et al
      . Erythrocyte fraction within retrieved thrombi contributes to thrombolytic response in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018;49:652–9.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019138 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374103
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      2. Fonarow GC ,
      3. Zhao X ,
      4. Smith EE , et al
      . Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative. JAMA 2014;311:1632–40.doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3203 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24756513
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      2. Rha J-H ,
      3. Saver JL
      . The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–73.doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258112.14918.24 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17272772
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      2. Khatri P ,
      3. Neff J ,
      4. Broderick JP , et al
      . Revascularization end points in stroke interventional trials: recanalization versus reperfusion in IMS-I. Stroke 2005;36:2400–3.doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000185698.45720.58 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16224088
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      2. Zaidat OO ,
      3. Yoo AJ ,
      4. Khatri P , et al
      . Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23920012
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      2. Eilaghi A ,
      3. Brooks J ,
      4. d'Esterre C , et al
      . Reperfusion is a stronger predictor of good clinical outcome than recanalization in ischemic stroke. Radiology 2013;269:240–8.doi:10.1148/radiol.13122327 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23716707
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    27. ↵
      2. Takagi T ,
      3. Kato T ,
      4. Sakai H , et al
      . Early neurologic improvement based on the National Institutes of health stroke scale score predicts favorable outcome within 30 minutes after undergoing intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:69–74.doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.09.013 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23164483
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      2. Yang P ,
      3. Zhang Y ,
      4. Zhang L , et al
      . Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase in acute stroke. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1981–93.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001123 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32374959
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      2. Zi W ,
      3. Qiu Z ,
      4. Li F , et al
      . Effect of endovascular treatment alone vs intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment on functional independence in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the DEVT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;325:234–43.doi:10.1001/jama.2020.23523 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464335
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    30. ↵
      2. Suzuki K ,
      3. Matsumaru Y ,
      4. Takeuchi M , et al
      . Effect of mechanical thrombectomy without vs with intravenous thrombolysis on functional outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke: the SKIP randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;325:244–53.doi:10.1001/jama.2020.23522 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464334
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      2. Dong Y ,
      3. Han Y ,
      4. Shen H , et al
      . Who may benefit from lower dosages of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator? Results from a cluster data analysis. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2020;5:348–52.doi:10.1136/svn-2020-000388 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611728
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    32. ↵
      2. Campbell BCV ,
      3. Mitchell PJ ,
      4. Churilov L , et al
      . Tenecteplase versus alteplase before thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1573–82.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1716405 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29694815
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      2. Renaud L ,
      3. Lebozec K ,
      4. Voors-Pette C , et al
      . Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of Glenzocimab (ACT017) a glycoprotein VI inhibitor of collagen-induced platelet aggregation. J Clin Pharmacol 2020;60:1198–208.doi:10.1002/jcph.1616 pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500636
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Collaborators THRACE investigators: Alain Bonafé, Xavier Leclerc, Nelly Agrinier, Serge Bakchine, Flore Baronnet, Marine Beaumont, Yannick Bejot, Jerome Berge, Marc Bintner, Romain Bourcier, Tae Hee Cho, Frédéric Clarencon, Julien Cogez, Charlotte Cordonnier, Christian Denier, Anne Laure Derelle, Olivier Detante, Xavier Ducrocq, Anthony Faivre, Anne Ferrier, Laetitia Gimenez, Sophie Godard, Benoit Guillon, Emmanuel Houdart, Bertrand Lapergue, Jean-Louis Mas, Thierry Moulin, Mariano Musacchio, Olivier Naggara, Jean Philippe Neau, Michael Obadia, Anne Pasco-Papon, Michel Piotin, Laurent Pierot, Helene Raoult, Frederic Ricolfi, Thomas Ronziere, Guillaume Saliou, Igor Sibon, Sebastien Soize, Jacques Sedat, Christian Stapf, Laurent Suissa, Marie Tisserand, Francis Turjman, Stephane Velasco

    • Contributors NR-C and SR collected data, performed analysis and drafted the manuscript. BG, SB and FG critically revised the manuscript for substantial changes. MS performed statistical analysis. FZ, YX, LH, GM and CO critically revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the submitted manuscript.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Author note The work has been carried out at Nancy Regional University Hospital, France.