Background The circle of Willis (COW) is part of the brain collateral system. The absence of COW segments may affect functional outcome in patients with ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy.
Methods In 182 patients in the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 Study and the CT Perfusion to Predict Response to Recanalisation in Ischaemic Stroke Project, COW anatomy was evaluated on postinterventional magnetic resonance angiography. The absence of the posterior communicating artery or the first segments of posterior or anterior cerebral arteries ipsilateral to the ischaemic infarction was rated as an incomplete COW. Logistic regression was applied to evaluate an association with the patients’ modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days after stroke
Results An incomplete ipsilateral COW was not predictive of the patients’ mRS at 90 days after stroke. Significant associations were shown for the patients’ baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), age and reperfusion status. The effect size suggests that a significant association of an incomplete COW with the mRS at 90 days may be obtained in cohorts of more than 3000 patients.
Conclusions Compared with the established predictors NIHSS, age and reperfusion status, an incomplete COW is not associated with functional outcome after endovascular therapy.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Endovascular therapy has revolutionised ischaemic stroke treatment in early and late time windows.1–3 Cerebral arterial collaterals maintain salvageable brain tissue and enable extended onset-to-reperfusion time windows.4 These collaterals include segments of the circle of Willis (COW) and leptomeningeal anastomoses. Previous studies have suggested an impact of missing COW segments on functional outcome in patients with ischaemic stroke.5–7 We analysed COW variants on postinterventional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) in patients in the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 Study (DEFUSE 2) and the CT Perfusion to Predict Response to Recanalisation in Ischaemic Stroke Project (CRISP).8 9 We postulated that the presence or absence of COW segments ipsilateral to the ischaemic infarction provides prognostic information.
Study design and participants
In patients in the DEFUSE 2 and CRISP studies, COW anatomy was evaluated after endovascular therapy on early (within 12 hours) or a late (day 5 after stroke) follow-up 1.5T or 3T TOF-MRA by an investigator blinded to demographic, clinical and other imaging data (TS-H.). Both studies had included ischaemic stroke patients with acute distal internal carotid artery (ICA) or proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions. Patients in both studies were not randomised and all scheduled to undergo endovascular therapy irrespective of their mismatch status on imaging. In the DEFUSE 2 and CRISP studies, 200/294 (68%) patients had hypertension, 64/294 (22%) diabetes mellitus, 129/294 (44%) hyperlipidaemia, 96/294 (33%) atrial fibrillation and 46/294 (16%) had a prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack.8 9
Ipsilateral to the occluded ICA or MCA, the absence of either the posterior communicating artery (PcomA), the first segment of the posterior cerebral artery (P1) or the first segment of the anterior cerebral artery (A1) were all rated as an incomplete COW. We considered that the anterior communicating artery (AcomA) cannot reliably be detected on 1.5T TOF-MRA based on our previous experience and published data.10 Therefore, the AcomA was not included into the analysis.
Reperfusion after endovascular therapy was defined as a more than 50% reduction in the volume of the perfusion-weighted MRI lesion (Tmax >6 s) between baseline and an early follow-up scan. If the early follow-up scan was of insufficient quality, not obtained or obtained more than 18 hours after the endovascular procedure, then reperfusion was based on angiographic criteria: perfusion re-established to more than 50% of the tissue supplied by the occluded vessel at completion of the angiographic procedure (ie, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2b or 3).11 Scoring of leptomeningeal collaterals on baseline interventional angiograms was done using a previously defined system where 0 is no collateral flow and 4 is complete and rapid collateral flow to the ischaemic territory.12 Patients were dichotomised whether they had poor (0–2) vs good (3-4) collaterals.
All patients or—if the patient was unable to—a relative provided informed written consent.
After data closure, all variables passed a plausibility check to detect outliers. No values have been excluded from the full data set. Associations between categorical variables were analysed by Welch’s test (patients’ age) or Fisher’s exact test (all other variables). Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the influence of an ipsilateral incomplete COW, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the patients’ age, reperfusion status and leptomeningeal collateral status on functional outcome. Patients were dichotomised whether they had favourable (modified Rankin Scale, mRS, 0–2) or unfavourable (mRS 3–6) functional outcomes at day 90 following stroke. ORs estimated from logistic regression models were obtained with corresponding 95% CIs. Model performance was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for goodness-of-fit. Improvements in prediction were assessed using Nagelkerke’s R². Variables not related to functional outcome or with only small effects were removed from the final model with the exception of an incomplete ipsilateral COW. Variable selection was done with stepwise procedures, forward selection with possible re-exclusion and backward selection with possible reinclusion. Backward and forward elimination procedures resulted in the same variable selection for the final model. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to find the optimal cut-off for baseline NIHSS, estimated by the highest Youden index to consider consequences of false positive and false negative predictions. Categorical data are presented as total numbers and percentages, continuous data as mean±SD. A p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics V.23 (IBM) and PASS V.15.
One hundred and eighty-two patients had a follow-up TOF-MRA of sufficient quality (92 men, 90 women; mean age 65.6 years; median NIHSS 16). An incomplete ipsilateral COW was found in 117 (64.3%) of them. Ipsilateral PcomA or P1 segments were absent in 115 (98.3%) of these 117 patients, and the A1 segment was absent in 8 (6.8%). Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are given in table 1. Patients with an incomplete ipsilateral COW were older and had higher NIHSS scores compared with patients with a complete ipsilateral COW.
In univariate analysis (table 2), baseline NIHSS (cut-off >15), age, and reperfusion status were identified to be predictive of the patients’ functional outcome. ICA occlusion or scoring of leptomeningeal collaterals on baseline interventional angiograms were not predictive. Leptomeningeal collateral scores were available in 114/182 (62.6%) patients. In patients who achieved reperfusion, a non-significant trend for a favourable functional outcome was observed with good versus poor collaterals.
For the final multivariate logistic regression model (table 2), Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness of fit test indicated a good fitting model (p=0.615). The logistic regression model was statistically significant (χ²(4)=59.30, p<0.0001). The model explained 37.1% (Nagelkerke’s R2) of the variance in functional outcome and correctly classified 73.1% of cases with a sensitivity of 70.5%, a specificity of 75.5%, a positive predictive value of 72.9%, and a negative predictive value of 73.2%. Of the four predictor variables, three of them reached statistical significance: baseline NIHSS (cut-off >15), the patients’ age and reperfusion status (table 2). Baseline NIHSS (cut-off >15) was the most predictive variable for functional outcome (ratio 0.192:1). Increasing age was associated with a decreased likelihood of a favourable functional outcome. Patients with reperfusion were 7.6 times more likely to have a favourable functional outcome.
An incomplete ipsilateral COW was not predictive of the patients’ functional outcome at 90 days in univariate and multivariate analyses (table 2). No association of an incomplete ipsilateral COW was found in sub-analyses when only patients who achieved reperfusion or who had an ICA or MCA occlusion were included. The effect size of an incomplete ipsilateral COW in the model is 1.280 (95% CI 0.697 to 2.349) based on n=182 patients in this study. A cohort of n=3020 patients would be required to yield an effect size of 2.785 to achieve a power of 90% for a statistically significant association of an incomplete ipsilateral COW with functional outcome. The significant predictors baseline NIHSS, the patients’ age, and reperfusion status already yield effect sizes considerably higher than 2.785 in this study with n=182 patients. Therefore, as compared with these established predictors, an incomplete ipsilateral COW does not contribute to outcome prediction in ischaemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy.
This study analysed COW anatomy in patients with anterior circulation stroke who underwent endovascular therapy. The patients’ baseline NIHSS, age and reperfusion status determine functional outcome at 3 months as already established.1–3 The analysis of COW variants does not add further prognostic information. Patients with an incomplete ipsilateral COW were significantly older which has been described previously in angiographic and pathological studies.13 14 A recent postmortem study revealed that these age-related variations are mainly due to aplastic communicating arteries.15 No association with neurodegenerative pathologies was found.15 A previous study reporting an association of an incomplete COW with worse functional outcome following non-cardiogenic ischaemic stroke did not correct for these age-dependent variations.7 A previously reported association of preserved ipsilateral anterior and PcomA with favourable functional outcomes in n=38 patients with distal ICA occlusion could not be replicated in our study.6 Others have described more fatal outcomes in n=152 patients after thrombectomy in MCA occlusion when both ipsilateral anterior and PcomA where absent on CT angiography.5 In our study, when either ICA (n=57) or MCA (n=125) occlusions were analysed separately, the presence or absence of ipsilateral A1 or P1/PcomA segments did not provide prognostic information about functional outcome.
After unsuccessful thrombectomy, postinterventional TOF-MRA may not correctly reflect collateral flow across COW segments. However, in patients who achieved reperfusion, we also did not find an association of an incomplete ipsilateral COW with functional outcome (data not shown). The presence or absence of the AcomA was not included into our analysis because this vessel is not reliably detected on 1.5T TOF-MRA.10 A robust detection of the AcomA may be obtained at higher field strengths of 3 or 7 Tesla.16
In summary, this study revealed no added value of the analysis of COW variants for prognosis of stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy as compared with established predictors. A statistically significant association of an incomplete ipsilateral COW with the mRS at 3 months may potentially be found in larger patient cohorts (n>3000).
TS-H and KE contributed equally.
Contributors TS-H: Design and concept of study; Data collection and analysis, drafting and revision of manuscript. KE: Data collection and analysis, drafting and revision of manuscript. SC: Data collection and analysis, drafting and revision of manuscript. EH: Data collection and analysis, drafting and revision of manuscript. CE: Drafting and revision for intellectual content. GWA: Drafting and revision for intellectual content. ML: Design and concept of study; Data collection and analysis, drafting and revision of manuscript
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests SC performs consulting work for iSchemaView; GWA is a consultant of iSchemaView and has an equity interest in iSchemaView.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval Stanford Research Compliance Office ID 10752 and ID 22227. Ethics approval was obtained from local institutional review boards.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.