Background Antiplatelet agents reduce recurrence after cerebral ischaemia but are not effective in all patients, in part because of treatment resistance. The primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients who are insensitive to clopidogrel. The secondary aim was to assess the association between insensitivity to clopidogrel and recurrent cerebrovascular events.
Methods Following written informed consent, independent patients with a recent non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, and taking clopidogrel, were enrolled. Platelet function was assessed with remote measurement of surface expression of P-selectin (CD62P) using commercial kits sensitive to aspirin or clopidogrel. Participants’ general practitioners provided details on recurrent vascular events at least 90 days later. Data are mean (SD) and median [IQR]. Resistance was defined as: aspirin median fluorescence (MF) >500 units, clopidogrel MF >860 units. Non-parametric descriptors and tests were used.
Results 63 patients were recruited: mean age 64 (13.7) years, women 47%. At baseline, 59 (95%) patients were taking clopidogrel alone with 3 (5%) on combined clopidogrel and aspirin. Assessment of platelet surface P-selectin revealed: aspirin test 528 [317, 834], >500 54.8%; clopidogrel test 429 [303, 656], >860 11.3%. No participants on aspirin and clopidogrel showed aspirin resistance. Thirteen (20.6%) patients had a recurrent cerebrovascular event; those with an ischaemic stroke had a non-significantly higher baseline P-selectin using the clopidogrel test as compared with those with no recurrence: 626 [380, 801] versus 406 [265, 609], p=0.08.
Conclusions Remote measurement of platelet function assessed using the platelet surface expression of P-selectin is feasible. 11% of patients taking clopidogrel showed resistance. No significant associations were noted between clopidogrel resistance and recurrent ischaemic events.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Antiplatelet drugs are effective at reducing recurrent events after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).1–6 Unlike other secondary prevention interventions such as blood pressure and lipid lowering, antithrombotic antiplatelet agents are prescribed and administered without ongoing monitoring as there are no widely available, affordable, effective and validated tests of platelet function. Despite this, over a third of patients in some cohorts are insensitive to the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel7 8; a smaller proportion of patients appear to be resistant to aspirin.8 9
Surface platelet expression of P-selectin (CD62P) correlates with other platelet function measures and can be tested remotely from the patient,10 in contrast to other techniques that cannot be used remotely.11 12 Antiplatelet resistance has been defined for aspirin as median fluorescence (MF) >500 units, and for clopidogrel MF >860 units in separate studies assessing acute coronary syndrome,13 and ischaemic stroke and patients with TIA, respectively.14 In a substudy of the large Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial, remote assessment of P-selectin was feasible and found that aspirin and clopidogrel reduced stimulated P-selectin although 25% of patients on clopidogrel had high on-treatment platelet activity.14
We assessed the proportion of patients with a history of cerebral ischaemia who were insensitive to clopidogrel and the association with recurrent ischaemic or bleeding events. Our primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients who are insensitive to clopidogrel. The secondary aim was to assess the association between insensitivity to clopidogrel and recurrent cerebrovascular events.
Independent adults (modified Rankin Scale, mRS≤3) aged ≥40 years at high risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke or TIA were eligible for recruitment if they had a clinical diagnosis of ischaemic non-cardioembolic stroke or TIA, were on clopidogrel for at least 5 days prior to recruitment and were able to provide written informed consent. Patients on anticoagulation (eg, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants, heparin) were excluded. Patients were recruited from the stroke service (inpatient or outpatient) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Participants were asked to complete a short questionnaire and underwent a blood test on the day of recruitment. We aimed to recruit 60 patients to assess the proportion of patients resistant to clopidogrel. The study was not powered to assess the association between P-selectin clopidogrel test values and clinical outcomes. The investigator-initiated study was funded by Platelet Solutions (Nottingham, UK) and Innovate UK SMART award, and sponsored by the University of Nottingham.
P-selectin is derived from alpha-granules within platelets and becomes exposed on the platelet surface membrane when platelets are activated. Measurement of surface expression of P-selectin was performed using commercial kits sensitive to aspirin or clopidogrel (Platelet Solutions). Citrate anticoagulated blood was kept at 37°C once collected using a dry heat pad and insulation pouch, then incubated with platelet stimulants: arachidonic acid 0.5 mM for aspirin testing; ADP 10 µM for clopidogrel testing; and an unstimulated sample for baseline expression. After 5 min of incubation, a fixative (PAMFix)15 was added and the fixed samples were transferred to the Nottingham flow cytometry laboratory for processing. Fixed blood was incubated with fluorescent antibodies to identify platelets (CD61) and P-selectin (CD62P). MF was recorded for platelet surface expression of P-selectin for each sample.
A questionnaire was completed by participants on recruitment detailing any history of bleeding while on antiplatelet medication. Participants’ general practitioners (GP) were contacted at least 90 days later to record any recurrent vascular events and confirmed with admitting hospital records where available. An additional follow-up telephone call at least 90 days following recruitment was performed in a subset of patients who provided separate written informed consent. Clinical outcomes were recorded, including: functional status (mRS); disability (Barthel Index); quality of life (European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale); cognition (telephone Mini-Mental State Examination), Modified Telephone Interview for Cognition Scale, verbal fluency); and mood (Zung Depression Scale).
Resistance was defined prospectively using cut-offs previously utilised in stroke patients in a large randomised controlled trial: aspirin MF >500 units, clopidogrel MF >860 units.14 Data are number (%), mean (SD) and median [IQR]. Baseline differences in groups based on antiplatelet therapy were assessed using analysis of variance for continuous variables or χ2 for categorical variables. Non-parametric descriptors and tests were used with significance set at p<0.05. Correlations between baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test values and clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman correlation with resultant ‘r’ and 2-sided p values. Analyses were performed using SPSS V.24.
Data pertaining to this paper are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Sixty-three patients were recruited although one had no data or blood collected. Of the remaining 62 participants, 53% were men with an average age of 64 years (table 1). The index event was stroke in 44 (71%) participants and TIA in the remaining 29%. All participants were on clopidogrel 75 mg daily and three were also on aspirin 75 mg daily at the time of recruitment. Participants on dual antiplatelets tended to have a prior history of TIA reflecting the results of the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial.4 Time from index event to recruitment was longer in those on clopidogrel only versus aspirin and clopidogrel. Seventeen (27%) participants had a history of minor bleeding on clopidogrel, with the remainder reporting no history of bleeding (table 1).
Assessment of platelet surface P-selectin in 62 participants revealed (table 2): aspirin test 528 [317, 834], >500 54.8%, figure 1; clopidogrel test 429 [303, 656], >860 11.3%, figure 2. Thus, 11.3% of participants had evidence of resistance to clopidogrel. No participants on aspirin and clopidogrel showed aspirin resistance. P-selectin levels for the clopidogrel test did not differ between patients taking and not taking a proton pump inhibitor (PPI 554 [307, 729] vs no PPI 406 [289, 626] (p=0.32)) or between patients with and without a history of bleeding (aspirin test: bleeding 691 [438,791] vs no bleeding 495 [296, 870], p=0.28; clopidogrel test: 444 [321, 685] vs 425 [285, 656], p=0.88) (table 3). No patients with minor bleeding were resistant to clopidogrel (clopidogrel test >860), while 7 (15.6%) patients with no bleeding symptoms were resistant to clopidogrel.
GP follow-up data were available for all participants. Thirteen (20.6%) participants had a recurrent vascular event during the follow-up period: nine ischaemic strokes and four TIAs. No participants died or had acute coronary syndromes during the follow-up period. Baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test levels were non-significantly higher in those participants that had a recurrent ischaemic stroke as compared with those without recurrence (626 [380, 801] vs 406 [265, 609], p=0.08). Only one participant with recurrent ischaemic stroke had baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test >860 suggestive of clopidogrel resistance. When pooled together, those with either a recurrent ischaemic stroke or TIA had non-significantly higher baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test levels compared with those with no recurrence (581 [328, 752] vs 406 [239, 609], p=0.15). Only 1/13 (7.7%) participant with recurrent ischaemic stroke or TIA had a baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test >860 as compared with 6/49 (12.2%) participants with no recurrence (p=0.65). There was no statistically significant correlation between baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test levels and recurrent cerebrovascular events using an ordinal scale where no event=0, TIA=1 and ischaemic stroke=2 (r=0.200, p=0.12).
Telephone follow-up data were only available for 19 (30.2%) participants. No statistically significant correlations were noted between baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test levels and clinical outcomes (table 4).
In this single centre study, remote measurement of platelet function assessed using the platelet surface expression of P-selectin was feasible. Over a tenth of patients taking clopidogrel showed resistance. There were non-significantly higher baseline P-selectin clopidogrel test levels in those participants who had a recurrent cerebral ischaemic event as compared with those with no recurrence.
The proportion of patients demonstrated to be resistant to clopidogrel varies in the literature but may exceed 35%.16 A variety of platelet function tests have been reported, but the majority need to be performed in a timely manner close to the patient. In comparison, platelet surface expression of P-selectin provides unique remote assessment of platelet function distal to the patient and has been shown to be feasible in healthy volunteers as well as patients with acute coronary syndrome, surgery and mild bleeding disorders.16 Furthermore, storage and transportation of the fixed samples to a core laboratory for analysis were feasible across multiple hospital sites as part of a large clinical trial of stroke and TIA patients.14 This analysis demonstrated that 24.7% of 97 patients on clopidogrel at baseline demonstrated clopidogrel resistance defined as MF >860,14 a higher proportion than in the present study.
In patients with acute coronary syndrome, clopidogrel resistance (demonstrated using platelet surface P-selection expression) has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome or stent thrombosis.13 The present study is the first to assess the association between baseline platelet surface expression of P-selectin indicative of clopidogrel resistance in patients with prior ischaemic stroke or TIA and recurrent cerebrovascular events. Although there was no association when using predefined cut points, median P-selectin clopidogrel test values were non-significantly higher in those with a recurrent vascular event than in those without. This finding needs to be replicated in larger datasets, but is in line with another study using thromboelastography ADP maximum amplitude as a marker of high on-treatment platelet reactivity, which was associated with a higher risk of recurrent ischaemic events at 90 days.17 However, there is an absence of trials assessing whether adjusting antiplatelet therapy post stroke in patients with clopidogrel resistance is feasible, safe and efficacious at reducing recurrent cerebrovascular events. Such adjustment might comprise switching from clopidogrel to aspirin, using combined aspirin and clopidogrel,4 5 or using combined aspirin and dipyridamole.6 18 19 In this respect, it is interesting to note in the present study that all patients on combined aspirin and clopidogrel had suppressed P-selectin expression with both of the aspirin and clopidogrel tests.
The strength of this study is its generalisability to clinical practice and further demonstration that platelet function can be assessed remotely after stroke, in this case in a predominantly outpatient population. However, there are several limitations. First, the study was small and this limited statistical power to assess the relationship between P-selectin expression and clinical outcome. This is particularly relevant for the binary comparison of non-supressed P-selectin versus stroke recurrence. Further, participants were assessed around 7 weeks after their index event and so at a time when the risk of recurrence was likely to be low. Second, as a predominantly outpatient population, the participants tended to have a mild stroke or TIA and so the results cannot be extrapolated to a more severe population. Third, we did not collect the time when antiplatelet medication was last taken and so were unable to assess whether the time from medication taken to blood testing impacting on the results. Last, we cannot rule out that some participants were non-compliant with their antiplatelet therapy.
In summary, we add to the growing body of evidence that remote assessment of platelet function using P-selectin is feasible and of potential benefit to patient management. Just over a tenth of patients were resistant to clopidogrel. Although there was a non-significant association with recurrent cerebrovascular events in those resistant to clopidogrel, the study was not powered to answer this definitively. Therefore, further studies are needed to establish whether platelet function testing can be used to guide antiplatelet therapy in patients who appear to be resistant to clopidogrel.
The authors thank the participants for taking part in this study.
Contributors JPA analysed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. JPA and CR were involved in data collection. ND and JM performed the laboratory analysis of the blood samples. NS, SH and PMB critically appraised the manuscript. PMB is responsible for study design, delivery and is study guarantor.
Funding The study was funded by Platelet Solutions (Nottingham UK) and Innovate UK SMART award.
Competing interests JA was funded in part by a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment grant for the TARDIS trial. JM and SH are inventors of the P-selectin assay and own stock in Platelet Solutions Ltd (PSL). ND is an employee and owns stock in PSL. PMB is Stroke Association Professor of Stroke Medicine and is a National Institute of Health Research Senior Investigator; he owns stock in PSL and has consulted previously for Sanofi and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval East Midlands UK ethics committee (06/Q2403/137; version 4.1, 12.10.2015).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement Data pertaining to this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.