Introduction
Stroke has become an enormous health issue across the world.1 2 Stroke burden in China has increased over the past three decades. More than 10 million Chinese are living with stroke with 2.4 million new cases in 2013.3 Improving healthcare quality is full of challenges but imperative.4 Over the past decade, stroke centre construction and quality improvement (QI) initiatives, such as the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) programme and Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care, have been implemented to significantly improve stroke care quality and outcomes in those high-income countries.5–10 Designated stroke centres have increased the use of thrombolytic therapy and modestly decreased mortality of hospitalised patients with acute ischaemic stroke (IS).5 Systems of care have to be structured efficiently to facilitate the delivery of care.1
Over the last decade, significant changes in the Chinese healthcare system have occurred with universal health insurance coverage in 2011.11 Stroke care improvement has become a national priority. Since 2007, several national strategies have been adopted to establish national stroke research networks and stroke registries, increase the compliance with evidence-based process performance measures of stroke care and develop stroke care organisation.12–14 In addition, clinical research and evidence-based guidelines for stroke and transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) care, with advanced diagnostic and treatment modalities, have been developed in China.15–17
These abovementioned national strategies in the healthcare system, policy and clinical research have improved, to some degree, evidence-based stroke care and patient outcomes.14 However, a comparison of two China National Stroke Registries (2007–2008 vs 2012–2013) demonstrated that adherence to these evidence-based interventions remains suboptimal, and gaps in adherence to guideline-recommended care are even greater in China when compared with other high-income counties, such as USA.8 14 18 For instance, in 2012, adherence to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator use (18.3%) and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (21.0%) is still low in China and was far below 2007 GWTG-Stroke adherence (72.84% and 98.39%, respectively).8 14 In 2012, a stroke centre survey of 521 hospitals from the China Stroke Research Network demonstrated that only 20 (3.8%) met the criteria for a comprehensive stroke centre, and only 179 (34.4%) met the criteria for a primary stroke centre.19 A multifaceted QI intervention increased hospital personnel adherence to evidence-based performance measures in patients with acute IS in China.20
To bridge these remarkable gaps between guideline recommendations and clinical practices, the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) programme was launched by the Chinese Stroke Association (CSA) in 2015. This article introduces CSCA’s objectives, operational structure, patient population, QI intervention tools, data elements, data collection methodology and current patient and hospital data.