Article Text

PDF

Association between admission haematocrit and mortality among men with acute ischaemic stroke
  1. Jason J Sico1,2,3,4,5,
  2. Laura J Myers6,7,
  3. Brenda J Fenton5,8,
  4. John Concato3,4,9,
  5. Linda S Williams6,7,10,11,
  6. Dawn M Bravata6,7,10,11,12
  1. 1 Neurology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
  2. 2 Department of Neurology, Center for NeuroEpidemiological and Clinical Neurological Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  3. 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  4. 4 Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
  5. 5 Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
  6. 6 Communication and the HSR&D Stroke Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  7. 7 VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D), Center for Healthcare Informatics, Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  8. 8 Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
  9. 9 Medical Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
  10. 10 Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  11. 11 Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  12. 12 Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jason J Sico; jason.sico{at}yale.edu

Abstract

Objective Anaemia is associated with higher mortality among patients with non-stroke cardiovascular conditions; less is known regarding the relationship between anaemia and mortality among patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

Methods Medical records were abstracted for n=3965 veterans from 131 Veterans Health Administration facilities who were admitted with ischaemic stroke in fiscal year 2007. Haematocrit values within 24 hours of admission were classified as ≤27%, 28%–32%, 33%–37%, 38%–42%, 43%–47% or ≥48%. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between anaemia and in-hospital, 30-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality, adjusting for age, medical comorbidities, modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-III and stroke severity. Impact factors were calculated to standardise comparisons between haematocrit tier and other covariates.

Results Among n=3750 patients included in the analysis, the haematocrit values were ≤27% in 2.1% (n=78), 28%–32% in 6.2% (n=234), 33%–37% in 17.9% (n=670), 38%–42% in 36.4% (n=1366), 43%–47% in 28.2% (n=1059) and ≥48% in 9.1% (n=343). Patients with haematocrit ≤27%, compared with patients in the 38%–42% range, were more likely to have died across all follow-up intervals, with statistically significant adjusted ORs (aORs) ranging from 2.5 to 3.5. Patients with polycythaemia (ie, haematocrit ≥48%) were at increased risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR=2.9; 95% CI 1.4 to 6.0), compared with patients with mid-range admission haematocrits. Pronounced differences between patients receiving and not receiving blood transfusion limited our ability to perform a propensity analysis. Impact factors in the 1-year mortality model were 0.46 (severe anaemia), 0.06 (cancer) and 0.018 (heart disease).

Conclusions Anaemia is independently associated with an increased risk of death throughout the first year post stroke; high haematocrit is associated with early poststroke mortality. Severe anaemia is associated with 1-year mortality to a greater degree than cancer or heart disease. These data cannot address the question of whether interventions targeting anaemia might improve patient outcomes.

  • ischemic stroke
  • anemia
  • polycythemia
  • hematocrit
  • mortality

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

Anaemia is an independent predictor of mortality among patients with non-stroke cardiovascular conditions, such as myocardial infarction (MI) and congestive heart failure (CHF).1–3 A relationship between baseline haematocrit and increased mortality within the acute ischaemic stroke population has been reported inconsistently.4–9 Some studies have found an independent association between anaemia and mortality,5 7 9–11 whereas other studies have not confirmed this relationship.4 6 Increased mortality with higher haematocrits has been described as well, such that a non-linear, U-shaped relationship between haematocrit and poststroke mortality may exist.8 10 11

Patients with medically complex acute stroke may be especially prone to poor outcomes in the presence of low or high haematocrit values, either through conditions associated with extreme haematocrit levels or through pathophysiological consequences of haematocrit abnormalities (including decreased oxygen delivery, alterations in blood viscosity and impaired cerebral autoregulation).8 9 12–17 Previous studies examining the relationship between haematocrit and mortality in ischaemic stroke have variably adjusted for important medical conditions and neurological status that contribute to mortality.18 Inability to adjust for the burden of medical illness and stroke severity, combined with analysing haemoglobin based on a dichotomous definition of anaemia, may be responsible for the variable association between haematocrit and mortality reported in the literature. More recently, one study controlled for age, comorbidities and ischaemic stroke subtype, finding that admission haemoglobin values of less than 12.4 g/dL (approximately a haemoglobin of 37.2%)19 in men were associated with increased mortality throughout the first year post stroke.10 The authors also noted that further studies were necessary to understand the potential role of haemoglobin augmentation interventions among patients with acute ischaemic stroke presenting with anaemia.10

We used data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to determine whether an association between baseline haematocrit and mortality exists throughout the first year post acute ischaemic stroke, and to assess the contribution of low and high haematocrit values to mortality during this time period, while controlling for burden of medical comorbidities and stroke severity. Given that the presence of lower measures of red blood cell volume was associated with greater mortality in prior work,1 10 we investigated whether finer tiers of haematocrit were associated with even higher mortality.1 Furthermore, we conducted a propensity analysis to understand whether receipt of blood transfusion among patients with anaemic ischaemic stroke affected postevent outcomes.

Methods

Patient population

The VHA Office of Quality Performance and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Stroke Quality Enhancement Research Initiative collaborated to conduct the first national VHA study of inpatient stroke quality. The study design and primary findings are reported elsewhere.20 In brief, VA administrative data were used to identify a study population of veterans (n=5721) who were admitted to a VA Medical Center (VAMC) in fiscal year 2007 (FY07) with a primary diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke. A sample of 5000 medical records were selected; these included all cases from small-volume centres (≤55 patients) and a random sample of 80% of veterans at high-volume facilities (>55 patients in FY07).20 Patients were excluded if they were admitted for elective carotid endarterectomy, for postacute ischaemic stroke rehabilitation or were already admitted for a non-stroke condition when the ischaemic stroke occurred, leaving a final sample of n=3965 veterans from 131 VAMCs for whom full chart reviews were performed.

In our current analyses, patients were also excluded when haematocrit laboratory values within 24 hours of acute stroke admission were unavailable (n=94), or when we found inconsistent death dates (n=6). Additional exclusions were based on limited sample size and included women (n=95) and patients who received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (n=32). The final analytic sample included 3750 veterans.

Data

Date were collected through retrospective chart review of medical records using remote electronic record data only (ie, no paper records were used). Chart reviews were performed by abstractors from the West Virginia Medical Institute who were especially trained for the study. Among the 307 data elements, 90% had an interobserver agreement ≥70% (please refer to online supplementary 1 for a representative sample of select covariates). Data collected for this study included demographic factors, medical comorbidities (eg, medical history, Charlson Index),21 stroke severity score (as measured by the retrospective National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS))22 and admission data (eg, vital signs, medication, laboratory tests, active medical conditions). Race/ethnicity data were obtained from the VHA’s Functional Status and Outcomes Database (FSOD), and supplemented by the VHA inpatient/outpatient files and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) if race/ethnicity was missing in the FSOD.

Supplementary file 1

Independent variable

The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality, as measured from the VA Vital Status File (VSF), containing dates of deaths from all VA beneficiaries. Death information in the VA VSF originates from a variety of VA and non-VA sources (eg, CMS). The VA VSF is relatively complete and accurate when compared with information contained in the National Death Index.23 We examined in-hospital, 30-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality.

Primary dependent variable

The primary dependent variable was haematocrit values within 24 hours of hospital admission, prespecified as an ordinal variable based on prior research (not involving the ischaemic stroke population) using categories of ≤27% (severe anaemia), 28%–32% (moderate anaemia), 33%–37% (mild anaemia), 38%–42% (mid-range; referent), 43%–47% (mid-range) and ≥48% (polycythaemia).2 Haematocrit was not dichotomised as anaemia based on the WHO criteria (ie, haemoglobin <13.7 g/dL in men and <12.6 g/dL in women),19 given previously reported non-linear associations between mortality and anaemia in non-stroke conditions1 2 24 and ischaemic stroke.6 9 11 We were unable to characterise the type of anaemia (eg, iron deficiency, anaemia of chronic disease) with the available data.

Covariates

Potential covariates associated with mortality were selected a priori based on prior research.9 17 21 25 26 Demographic variables, admission laboratory values (eg, platelet count), admission vital sign data (eg, oxygen saturation) and medical comorbidities were considered.21 In addition, the modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-III25 (factoring out the contribution of haematocrit) and NIHSS scores were included.22

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses used SAS V.9.2. We conducted bivariate analyses to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample across each of the six categories of haematocrit, and we assessed differences using χ2 tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance tests for continuous variables.

Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the association between haematocrit and mortality, after adjusting for covariates. A ratio of 10 outcome events per variable was maintained during model construction.27 28 A p value of <0.05 was used to demarcate statistical significance. The final multivariate logistic regression models included confounders selected a priori and identified in bivariate analyses as important predictors of mortality. The final mortality models included age (in 10-year increments), medical history of heart disease, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease requiring dialysis and atrial fibrillation, and admission hypoxia (oxygen saturation <90%), pneumonia and thrombocytopaenia (platelet count <100 cells/mm3),26 modified APACHE-III (as a measure of acute severity of disease), Charlson Index (as a measure of chronic disease comorbidity) and NIHSS (as a measure of stroke severity). No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. As missing data were rare, imputations were not made for missing data. Adjusted ORs (aORs) and 95% CIs are presented. For each regression model, discrimination (C-statistics) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit (HLGOF)) statistics were calculated to gauge model performance and fit, respectively.29 30 Finally, survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using log-rank statistics.

Impact factors were calculated to make a standardised comparison between each category of haematocrit, medical comorbidities and NIHSS, and their contribution to mortality throughout the first year post stroke (online supplementary 2).29 30 To assess the contribution of blood transfusions on risk of mortality, a propensity analysis was conducted.

Supplementary file 2

Results

The mean age of n=3750 veterans in the study was 67.9 years, and 67% were white. The distribution of haematocrit categories at admission (table 1) included approximately 2% with severe anaemia (haematocrit ≤27%) and 9% with polycythaemia (haematocrit ≥48%). The bivariate relationship between haematocrit levels and demographic, clinical characteristics and mortality is shown in tables 1 and 2.

Table 1

Characteristics of patients with ischaemic stroke*

Table 2

Haematocrit level and mortality

In multivariate logistic regression analyses, both low and high levels of haematocrit were significantly associated with mortality. Compared with patients with mid-range haematocrit levels (38%–42%), patients with severe anaemia (≤27%) had aORs of 2.5–3.5 for mortality across all time points; all associations were statistically significant (table 3). Patients with mild and moderate anaemia also experienced increased mortality for 6-month and 1-year outcomes (table 3; figure 1). Mid-range haematocrits of 43%–47% were not associated with increased mortality. Polycythaemia was associated only with in-hospital mortality (aOR=2.89; 95% CI 1.39 to 6.00). The C-statistics for the models predicting mortality were excellent (C-statistic >0.8 for all models). The HLGOF statistics for all models were non-significant (HLGOF >0.05), indicating that model fit was good. The impact factors for variables in the 1-year mortality model were as follows: severe anaemia (0.46), NIHSS (0.23), history of cancer (0.06) and heart disease (0.018) (online supplementary 2).29

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating 1-year survival by admission haematocrit for men with ischaemic stroke. Tiers of haematocrit include ≤27% (orange) (severe anaemia), 28%–32% (grey) (moderate anaemia), 33%–37% (red) (mild anaemia), 38%–42% (green) (referent), 43%–47% (blue) and ≥48% (yellow) (polycythaemia). Severe anaemia was associated with the highest mortality, beginning during the index ischaemic stroke hospitalisation, whereas moderate and mild anaemia were associated with increased mortality by 6 months after hospital discharge. Polycythaemia was associated with mortality only during the index hospitalisation.

Table 3

Association between haematocrit and mortality

Blood was transfused in n=73 (2.0%) of patients at admission; n=57 (78.1%) occurred in patients with haematocrits <38% (table 1). Patients receiving a blood transfusion were more likely to die during the hospitalisation (17.8% vs 3.3%), at 30 days (32.9% vs 7.3%), 6 months (49.3% vs 13.8%) and 1 year (61.6% vs 18.0%) (p<0.0001 for all). In conducting a propensity analysis, given the pronounced differences between patients who did and those who did not receive blood transfusions, a stable propensity model could not be developed.

Discussion

After adjusting for relevant medical conditions, measures of acute severity of disease and burden of chronic medical comorbidities, and stroke severity, mild and moderate anaemia were only associated with increased 6-month and 1-year mortality among men. Severe anaemia was associated with increased mortality from hospital admission throughout the first year post stroke. Furthermore, severe anaemia at admission was associated with 1-year mortality to a similar degree as stroke severity and to a greater degree than a history of either heart disease or cancer. Polycythaemia was associated only with in-hospital mortality, confirming a U-shaped relationship between measures of red blood cell volume and postischaemic stroke outcomes.8 10 11

The prevalence of anaemia and the association between haematocrit and mortality (all-cause and non-cardiovascular) have been described among those with non-stroke conditions.1–3 Increased in-hospital and 30-day postacute MI mortality has been reported with worsening degrees of anaemia.3 Similarly, among patients ≥65 years of age admitted with CHF, haematocrit ≤27% was associated with increased 1-year mortality (HR=1.40; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.92)2; this association was largely attributed to the burden of medical comorbidities, suggesting that anaemia may be a marker, rather than a prime driver, of increased mortality in this population.1

The prevalence of WHO-defined anaemia among patients with ischaemic stroke has ranged from 15% to 25%; the association between haematocrit and mortality has been variably described.4 7–9 11 During an ischaemic stroke hospitalisation, admission anaemia has been associated with the combined endpoint of in-hospital mortality and discharge to hospice in those with NIHSS<10 (aOR=4.14; 95% CI 1.47 to 11.90).9 After adjusting for age, sex, medical comorbidities, prior disability, NIHSS and stroke subtype (ie, ischaemic or haemorrhagic), anaemia has been associated with higher mortality at 1 month (aOR=1.90; 95% CI 1.05 to 3.43) and 1 year (aOR=1.72; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.93).11 Elsewhere, increased 6-month poststroke mortality (aOR=4.70; 95% CI 1.1 to 8.2) was reported after adjusting for age, Scandinavian Stroke Score and a combined variable of heart failure and/or impaired renal function and/or troponin T>0.01 01 µg/L.7 Additional studies have noted that admission anaemia among patients with first atherosclerosis-related stroke was associated with higher 3-year mortality (aOR=2.22; 95% CI 1.13 to 4.39) after controlling for age, coronary artery disease, chronic renal insufficiency and hyperlipidaemia.5 Others have found that baseline haematocrit was not associated with poststroke mortality; rather, a decrease in haematocrit value from baseline was associated with increased mortality (aOR=1.12; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23; p=0.027).6 More recently, in a sample of 3298 male patients with ischaemic stroke, after controlling for age, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score, comorbidities, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification and prior antithrombotic use, a haemoglobin less than 12.4 g/dL (approximately a haemoglobin of 37.2%) was associated with increased odds of death throughout the first year post stroke.10 In examining poststroke mortality among patients presenting with haematocrit values corresponding to a haemoglobin less than 12.4 g/dL (ie, ≤27%, 28%–32% and 33%–37%), we report an even greater odds of mortality with the lowest measures of red blood cell volume.8 10

Higher haematocrit levels have previously been associated with increased stroke risk, especially haematocrits >45%.10 31 32 Among patients with first ever stroke, the literature reports that women were more likely than men to have haematocrits >50% (6.6% vs 2.8%; p<0.0001). After adjusting for age, vascular risk factors, chronic atrial fibrillation, the presence of total anterior circulation infarction and haematocrit categories, haematocrits 46%–50% and >50% independently predicted 28-day mortality in women, but not men.8 Others reported that patients with ischaemic stroke in the highest haemoglobin quartiles (≥15.3 g/dL in men and ≥14.2 g/dL in women) had higher 1-month and 1-year mortality rates than patients in the middle quartiles.11 Elsewhere, higher inpatient and 1-month mortality was noted among patients within the highest quintile (≥15.6 g/dL).10 The authors postulated that higher haemoglobin values could be seen in dehydration and COPD. In our cohort, admission creatinine and blood/urea/nitrogen were higher than the normal reference range, possibly reflecting hypovolaemia at the time of presentation, whereas COPD occurred more often in patients with lower haematocrits.

Anaemia may reflect the underlying health status of patients with stroke, given the advanced age and burden of comorbid illnesses that are seen in patients with stroke with anaemia compared with patients with more mid-range (38%–47%) haematocrit. Oxygen delivery to the brain is optimal at a haematocrit of 40%,33 and mid-range haematocrit has been associated with better stroke outcomes (eg, discharge to hospice vs inpatient rehabilitation unit; improved 3-month modified Rankin score).4 6 Across studies, anaemic poststroke patients with cardiac disease, malignancy, renal impairment, older age and worse stroke severity had higher mortality.3 5 7 9 11 Similar to these studies, we found older age, higher comorbid disease burden and worse stroke severity occurred commonly among patients with lower haematocrits. Anaemia may confer increased mortality risk beyond its association with medical illness, perhaps through its influence on cerebral perfusion pressure and flow dynamics both to and within the ischaemic penumbra.

Based on the current results and the extant literature, it seems prudent to evaluate patients with stroke for treatable causes of anaemia, and to minimise hospital-acquired anaemia during an acute ischaemia stroke admission. From the available data, haemoglobin augmentation strategies cannot be advocated for poststroke patients at this time.34 While haemoglobin augmentation strategies have been associated with favourable outcomes in patients with MI and CHF, in patients with chronic kidney disease, diabetes and anaemia, darbepoetin alfa administration was associated with increased stroke risk (5.0% vs 2.6%, HR: 1.92; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.68, p<0.001).33 Mathematical modelling data support a transfusion threshold of haematocrit <30% among patients with acute ischaemic stroke.13 When applying this transfusion threshold to our cohort, 180 (4.8%) patients would have received a blood transfusion. However, receipt of blood transfusion during a hospitalisation for acute ischaemic stroke was neither correlated with improved in-hospital nor 90-day mortality.35 As there were such pronounced differences between patients with anaemia who did and did not receive blood transfusion, a stable propensity model could not be generated.35 Additional work is required to evaluate whether interventions that treat anaemia or polycythaemia reduce poststroke mortality.

The strengths of our study include the large sample size and the ability to control for several important medical conditions, stroke severity and admission vital sign data. Limitations include an entirely male (veteran) population, and the results may not be generalisable to women. Of note, prior studies have found that the prevalence of anaemia is similar between men and women, but higher haematocrit levels were associated with mortality only among women.8 24 Second, we cannot comment on the aetiology of anaemia and how causes of anaemia may influence outcomes. Few of our patients (0.5% of the entire sample) had gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding; it is therefore likely that most of the anaemia in this cohort was not secondary to acute blood loss. Third, we can only examine the relationship between admission haematocrit and mortality, and not trends in haematocrit observed during hospitalisation or after discharge. Studies have reported that anaemia acquired during an acute ischaemic stroke hospitalisation was more predictive of poorer outcomes than baseline haematocrit.6 Fourth, we are unable to ascertain the cause of death in our cohort, although sepsis, acute organ failure and cancer would be expected to account for a higher proportion of death among patients with severe anaemia compared with more normal haematocrit values. In previous work examining death certificate data, we reported that most poststroke mortality among patients with and without anaemia was attributable to the incident stroke, rather than to concomitant medical comorbidities.36 Finally, we cannot comment on stroke subtype. One study reported no association between elevated haematocrit and large-vessel stroke,36 whereas others found an association between intracranial atherosclerosis and stroke.5

Recognising the presence and importance of a non-linear, U-shaped association between admission haematocrit and all-cause poststroke mortality may have implications at both the patient level, regarding evaluation and management, as well as at the facility level, when understanding risk-adjusted outcomes at discrete time points.37 Additional work is required to understand whether intervening on anaemia via haemoglobin augmentation strategies (eg, blood transfusion) and polycythaemia improves poststroke trajectories of care.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors JJS: study concept and design; analysis and interpretation. LJM, BJF: analysis and interpretation. JC, LSW: study concept and design; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. DMB: study concept and design; analysis and interpretation; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

  • Funding This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, VHA, Office of Quality and Performance, and Health Services Research & Development Service Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Service Directed Project 12-178 and Career Development Award 11-262, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Stroke Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Rapid Response Project 09-184. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval The VA Institutional Review Boards in West Haven, Connecticut, and Indianapolis, Indiana, approved this study.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.