Study/Year/ Country | Perspective | Intervention | Modelling method | Economic data | Clinical data | ||
Data collection/ Analyses | Previous literature | Data collection/ Analyses | Previous literature | ||||
Te Ao et al 36/2015/New Zealand | Health funder perspective | IV rtPA use within 4.5 hours after onset | Simulation model (TreeAge, Excel) | No | Yes | Yes ARCOS III | Yes |
Yan et al 33/2015/China | Chinese public health system perspective | IV rtPA use within 6 hours after onset | Decision tree | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Boudreau et al 24/2014/USA | US payers’ perspective | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | Decision tree, and Markov model (Excel) | Yes (rtPA cost) Analy$ource | Yes | No | Yes |
Pan et al 34/2014/China | Healthcare payers’ perspective | IV rtPA use within 4.5 hours after onset | Decision tree and Markov model | Yes CNSR, CHSY TIMS-China | No | Yes TIMS-China | Yes |
Boudreau et al 25/2013/USA | Payers’ perspective | IV rtPA use within 3–4.5 hours after onset | Decision tree, and Markov model (Excel) | Yes Medicare reimbursement | Yes | No | Yes |
Kazley et al 26/2013/USA (SC) | Societal perspective | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | Markov model | Yes Hospital billing, HCUP | No | No | Yes |
Tan Tanny et al 31/2013/Australia | Societal and healthcare perspective | IV rtPA use within 4.5 hours after onset | Decision analytic model (Excel), and Monte Carlo simulation | Yes Royal Melbourne Hospital | Yes | Yes Royal Melbourne Hospital | Yes |
Tung et al 27/2011/USA | Societal perspective | IV rtPA use within 3–4.5 hours after onset | A decision-analytic model (TreeAge) | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Johnston28/2010/USA | NA | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | NA | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Ehlers et al 37/2007/Denmark | NA | IV rtPA use within 3 hours with 24 hours in house neurology coverage andMRI | Decision tree with Markov model (TreeAge) | Yes Aarhus Hospital and Hvidovre Hospital data | Yes | Yes Aarhus Stroke Register, Death Register | Yes |
Mar et al 38/2005/Spain | Societal perspective | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | Monte Carlo simulation (4000, no modelling) | Yes Sakontzen questionnaire and social service experts | Yes | Yes Survey from hospitals in the province of Gipuzkoa | Yes |
Moodie et al 32/2004/Australia | Healthcare perspective | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | MORUCOS | Yes NEMESIS | No | Yes NEMESIS | No |
Sandercock et al 29/2004/UK | Healthcare and personal social services perspective | IV rtPA use within 6 hours after onset | Decision analysis model (TreeAge) | Yes Western General Hospital, Edinburgh | Yes | No | Yes |
Chambers et al 30/2002/UK | Healthcare and social care perspective | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | Stroke Outcome Model (TreeAge, Excel) | Yes Clinicians’ panels | Yes | No | Yes |
Sinclair et al 35/2001/Canada | Healthcare system perspective | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | Decision analytic model (TreeAge), and Markov model | Yes Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre | Yes | No | Yes |
Fagan et al 9/1998/USA | Healthcare system perspective | IV rtPA use within 3 hours after onset | Markov model | Yes (rtPA cost) Seven Detroit area hospitals | Yes | No | Yes |
ARCOS III, Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study.
CNSR, China National Stroke Registry.
CHSY, China Health Statistics Yearbook.
HCUP, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.
IV rtPA, intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; NA, not applicable.
MORUCOS, Model of Resource Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes for Stroke.
NEMESIS, North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study.
TIMS-China study, Thrombolysis Implementation and Monitor of acute ischaemic Stroke in China study.