You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Review
Multimodal management of giant cerebral aneurysms: review of literature and case presentation
  1. Jessica K Campos1,
  2. Benjamin Z Ball1,
  3. Barry Cheaney II2,
  4. Alexander J Sweidan3,
  5. Bima J Hasjim1,
  6. Frank P K Hsu1,
  7. Alice S Wang4,
  8. Li-Mei Lin5
  1. 1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
  2. 2 Oregon Health & Science University, School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA
  3. 3 Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
  4. 4 Western University of Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Pomona, California, USA
  5. 5 Carondelet Neurological Institute, St Joseph’s Hospital, Carondelet Health Network, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Li-Mei Lin; drlimeilin{at}gmail.com

Abstract

The pathophysiology of giant cerebral aneurysms renders them difficult to treat. Advances in technology have attempted to address any shortcomings associated with open surgery or endovascular therapies. Since the introduction of the flow diversion technique, the endovascular approach with flow diversion has become the first-line modality chosen to treat giant aneurysms. A subset of these giant aneurysms may persistent despite any treatment modality. Perhaps the best option for these recurrent and/or persistent giant aneurysms is to employ a multimodal approach—both surgical and endovascular—rather than any single technique to provide a curative result with favourable patient outcomes. This paper provides a review of the histopathology and treatment options for giant cerebral aneurysms. Additionally, an illustrative case is presented to highlight the unique challenges of a curative solution for giant cerebral aneurysms that persist despite initial treatment.

  • aneurysm
  • flow diverter
  • coil
  • artery
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2019-000304

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Giant cerebral aneurysms (>25 mm) may be treated via endovascular or microsurgical means, with each approach having its own benefits, risks and technical challenges. They represent an extremely complicated subset of aneurysm pathology. Giant aneurysms may require a multimodal approach combining both endovascular and microsurgical approaches to achieve the best possible outcomes.

    Pathophysiology

    Giant aneurysms, defined as >25 mm, are histopathologically distinct. They have a loss of type I collagen and fibronectin in the adventitia and muscularis mucosa, respectively.1 Constant blood pulsations weaken the vessel wall, degenerate the internal elastic lamina and stretch the aneurysm dome.2 Scarring of the aneurysm wall results from the formation of thrombi within the wall and laminar necrosis. In addition, frequent microhaemorrhages in the aneurysm wall from parasitised vasa vasorum are subject to encapsulation and re-organisation by fibroblasts.3 These fibroblasts produce connective tissue that reinforces the wall while still permitting it to grow.4 5 These recurrent haemorrhages have been postulated to be the cause of a giant aneurysm’s slower growth rates compared with smaller aneurysms.6 Certain locations, such as the ophthalmic and cavernous segments of the internal carotid artery (ICA), are more likely to allow for the development of giant aneurysms due to the adjacent anterior clinoid process as well as the dura of the cavernous sinus which each partially shield the aneurysm dome and buttress it against haemodynamic forces that might otherwise cause rupture.7

    Treatment options

    Microsurgical techniques

    Microsurgical intervention for giant aneurysms has been reported dating back to the 1950s.8 It has varying success depending on the specific intervention selected, with the most common being clipping or aneurysm trapping with extracranial–intracranial bypass. Mortality has been reported at least 6% and up to 13%, whereas favourable clinical outcomes range from 71% to 80% in most series.9–12

    Gewirtz and Awad reported the results of 35 patients treated with microsurgical clipping for giant aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Twenty-six (68%) of these patients presented with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Thirty-three were treated with one or more clips across the aneurysm neck, and two were treated with aneurysm trapping. Thirty-four of 35 (97%) giant aneurysms were completely obliterated and patency of all of the parent arteries was achieved in 30 cases (86%). The clinical outcome, as defined by authors, was 34% ‘excellent’, 37% ‘good’, 14% ‘fair’, 9% ‘poor’ and 6% ‘death’. Nine patients suffered neurological morbidity and mortality was 6% with good or excellent clinical outcomes in 71%.10 Similarly, Nanda et al conducted a study of 59 giant aneurysms treated by surgical clipping by a single surgeon. Forty-eight had anterior circulation and 11 had posterior circulation aneurysms. The mortality rate was 10.1% (11 patients). The majority (71.9%) experienced a good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) of 4 or 5). Predictors of the poor outcome included ruptured aneurysm, poor clinical outcome and posterior location.12 Additionally, in Cantore et al’s series on 58 patients with giant aneurysms treated with surgical clipping, the mortality rate was 6.9% and clinical improvement 94.4%.9

    Microsurgical clip reconstruction requires some form of aneurysmal neck, even if it is broad and fenestrated or encircling clips can be implemented for reconstruction. The option of bypass must be entertained if clip deployment obstructs the patency of one or more arteries. Temporary trapping is required along with blood pressure augmentation in order to enhance collateral flow while temporary clips are placed. The aneurysm can then be punctured and decompressed, however, if a significant thrombus is present, endoaneurysmectomy must be performed.13 Multiple bypass approaches exist including direct vessel reimplantation, side-to-side vessel anastomosis, low-flow extracranial-intracranial bypass and high-flow extracranial–intracranial (EC-IC) bypass.14–18 A bypass is done under burst suppression and temporary clip occlusion. Once the bypass is complete, patency is verified via the micro-Doppler technique along with an intraoperative angiogram. The aneurysm is then subsequently treated during the same operation via trapping or occlusion. If proximal occlusion were to obstruct branch vessels or perforators, distal occlusion can be done.19 20 Cantore et al reported results on 41 patients with giant aneurysms managed with high-flow EC-IC bypass. Four (9.8%) died and 34 (91.9%) improved. Graft patency at the follow-up examination was 92.7%.9

    The use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with microsurgical clipping or bypass approaches is a modality that has waned in popularity. The procedure has an unpredictable recovery after circulatory arrest, with treatment complications approaching 40% with an additional 20% medical complications such as cardiac arrhythmias, pneumonia, sepsis, seizures and pulmonary embolism. Postoperative haemorrhage is also of significant concern.21 22 The 30-day perioperative mortality ranges from 12% to 18%. Temporary pharmacological cardiac standstill with adenosine has replaced deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with a more acceptable risk profile.8

    Endovascular options

    Balloon test occlusion with vessel sacrifice

    Proximal occlusion of giant aneurysms via endovascular parent vessel sacrifice is feasible when appropriate collateral circulation exists. Preoperative testing of the adequate circle of Willis collateral circulation is most commonly performed with temporary balloon test occlusion (BTO). However, patients who pass BTO still harbour a 5%–25% risk of ischaemic stroke after parent vessel sacrifice secondary to haemodynamic and thromboembolic causes. Both a BTO without the development of neurological deficit and a transcranial Doppler demonstrating no >30% drop in the middle cerebral artery velocity from baseline should be demonstrated prior to embolisation.23 Complications related to BTOs with associated vessel sacrifice include transient ischaemic attacks from relative ischaemia, thromboembolic strokes and development of aneurysms.24

    Coil embolisation

    Coil embolisation of giant cerebral aneurysms is associated with significantly high retreatment rates. Chalouhi et al studied 334 large and giant aneurysms (80% anterior circulation) that were coiled at a single institution. Thirty-two (10%) were giant aneurysms. Recanalisation and retreatment rates were 39% and 33%, respectively.25 Recanalisation is highest in the setting of wide residual aneurysm necks, largely due to coil compaction, growing residual aneurysm neck, and refilling fundus.3 26 27 Fernandez et al series with 51 wide-necked aneurysms (necks>4 mm) treated with coil embolisation reported complete thrombosis was observed in only 15%.28 Additionally, Horowitz et al’s retrospective study evaluating aneurysm recurrences or subtotal initial coil embolisation found seven of the nine patients requiring repeat treatment were secondary to coil compaction.26 Comparatively, Hasan et al demonstrated in a study of 175 coiled aneurysms, 8 had major recurrences resulting from significant aneurysm sac growth (15% to 102% increase), independent of change in coil volume.27

    Vascular reconstruction devices (VRD), such as Neuroform Atlas Stent (Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California, USA), Low-profile Visualised Intraluminal Support (LVIS; Microvention, Tustin, California, USA) and PulseRider (Cerenovus, Irvine, California, USA), were designed to augment coil embolisations of wide-neck aneurysms. An in vitro study demonstrated that these devices reinforce embolisation by improving coil neck coverage and increasing coil packing density.29 Both LVIS Jr and Neuroform Atlas stents provide low profile advantages with delivery through a 0.017-inch microcatheter. Several centres have published procedural successes with both VRDs in Y-stent assisted coilings for wide-necked aneurysms.30–32 In comparison with the tubular constructs of LVIS Jr and Neuroform Atlas VRDs, the PulseRider stent was uniquely designed in two distinct shapes, T or Y, with the intention to address coiling challenges of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The Adjunctive Neurovascular Support of Wide-neck Aneurysm Embolization and Reconstruction (ANSWER) Trial evaluated PulseRider efficacy in the treatment of 34 bifurcation aneurysms. Of the treated aneurysms, 82.4% achieved immediate Raymond I or II occlusion and at a 6-month follow-up, the rate increased to 87.9%.33 These results led to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2017. Although VRDs are used as procedural adjuncts for the treatment of giant aneurysms, recanalisation rates remain high given the challenging pathology of giant aneurysms.26 27 29

    Flow diversion embolisation

    Flow diversion is the newest endovascular technique specifically designed for the treatment of giant aneurysms. Flow diversion is fundamentally based on two concepts: (1) the placement of a high-density mesh device in the parent vessel disrupts blood flow into the aneurysm, resulting in progressive intra-aneurysmal thrombosis and (2) the device provides a scaffold for which endothelial cells can grow to isolate the aneurysm from the parent artery with subsequent radiographic obliteration of the aneurysm.34 Since the initial introduction of flow diversion in the 2000s, there have been a number of publications on the proven efficacy in durable curative treatments of giant aneurysms as well as safety with morbidity and mortality rates less than open microsurgical clipping.34–44

    In the USA, the Pipeline Embolisation Device (PED; Medtronic Neurovascular, Irvine, California, USA) and the Surpass flow diverter (Surpass; Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California, USA) are the only two flow diverter devices approved by the FDA. A large, single-centre study looking at outcomes after PED flow diversion of anterior circulation aneurysms to identify predictors of occlusion and aneurysm persistence was performed by Bender et al. Four hundred forty-five PED procedures were performed, with 85 large (19%) and 4 giant (1%) aneurysms. Complete occlusion was achieved in 72%, 78% and 87% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. The overall rate of major complications was 3.5%, including a 1.1% rate of a major stroke, a 1.8% rate of intracranial haemorrhage and a 0.7% rate of subarachnoid haemorrhage, leading to 1.1% rate of mortality. Further analysis revealed that at 12 months, adjunctive coiling predicted occlusion, whereas male sex, aneurysm size and incorporation of a branch vessel predicted aneurysm persistence. Prior treatments, vessel of origin, fusiform morphology and number of devices used did not predict aneurysm occlusion.39

    Comparatively, the Surpass Flow Diverter (Surpass; Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California, USA) is the second flow diverter available in the USA after FDA approval in 2018. Approval was based on results of the SCENT Trial (Surpass IntraCranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Wide Neck Aneurysms) designed as a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, non-randomised, interventional trial of the Surpass Flow Diverter for uncoilable or previously treated but failed aneurysms of the intracranial ICA extending from the petrous segment to the carotid terminus. All aneurysms had a wide neck (>4 mm) and large or giant size (>10 mm).42 One-hundred eighty aneurysms were treated at 26 medical centres. The mean aneurysm size was 12.0 mm with 13 (7.4%) giant aneurysms. Unlike the clinical trial for PED FDA approval PUFS (Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms), the majority of the aneurysms treated in SCENT were intradural in location, beyond the cavernous ICA. The device was successfully implanted in 97.8% of patients. SCENT met both primary safety (major ipsilateral stroke or neurological death within 12 months) and effectiveness (complete aneurysm occlusion, absence of significant parent artery stenosis (>50%), and no retreatment at 12 months) endpoints: 12-month primary effectiveness rate was 62.8% ((113/180); 95% CI: 55.3 to 69.9) and 12-month major ipsilateral stroke or neurological death rate was 8.3% ((15/180); 95% CI: 4.7 to 13.4). With these results, Surpass provides safe and effective flow diversion of large or giant, wide-neck ICA aneurysms.42

    Combined microsurgical and endovascular options

    Giant aneurysms represent complex and challenging aneurysms to treat despite open microsurgical and endovascular advances. There are several reports of using combined microsurgical and endovascular approaches with good results. In Arnautović et al’s study, eight patients with giant paraclinoid aneurysms underwent endovascular balloon occlusion of the ICA with suction decompression of the aneurysm, followed by clip ligation. Postoperative results were ‘good’ (defined by the ability to return to the patient’s usual preoperative activities) in seven of eight patients (87.5%) and fair in one of eight patients (12.5%). This patient experienced right-sided hemiplegia and expressive aphasia.45

    Lawton et al retrospectively reviewed 96 aneurysms, 18 of which were giant aneurysms, treated with multimodality therapy. In each patient, multimodality therapy was initiated for aneurysm occlusion in one of the following eight combinations: (1) selective revascularisation and aneurysm occlusion, (2) endovascular and surgical trapping, (3) clipping of aneurysm after attempted or incomplete coiling, (4) coiling after attempted or incomplete clipping, (5) clipping of recurrent aneurysm after coiling, (6) coiling of recurrent aneurysm after clipping, (7) coiling after previous surgery, and (8) clipping and coiling of multiple remote aneurysms. Morbidity was 11% and mortality was 11% with combined treatment.46 Lin et al identified anterior communicating artery region aneurysms with recurrences after microsurgical clipping that were subsequently treated with PED. Nine PED were performed for six recurrent aneurysms without any complications. Five of the six (83%) demonstrated complete occlusion, therefore, flow diversions with PED is an option following recurrences after surgical clipping.47 Ponce et al conducted a study of nine giant aneurysms treated with vascular bypass and endovascular parent artery occlusion. There was one case of hydrocephalus, one ischaemic stroke, three epidural haematomas and two deaths.48 In a separate study by Serbinenko et al, nine patients with giant ICA aneurysms were treated with combined EC-IC bypass and endovascular ICA occlusion. There no complications reported.49 Hoh et al treated 48 fusiform and complex wide-necked aneurysms with endovascular occlusion and either vascular bypass, clip ligation or both. In patients with giant aneurysms, GOS was 5 in two patients and 4 in two patients; one patient death was reported.50

    The following case serves as an example to illustrate some of these challenges and highlight the potential need for a combined endovascular and microsurgical approach for definitive treatment.

    Case example

    A sexagenarian presented to another institution with progressive vision loss in the left eye while abroad in the UK. After admission to the hospital, workup revealed a giant non-ruptured 50 mm left PCoA aneurysm. Primary endovascular treatment with stent-assisted coiling was performed. Per documentation, the follow-up demonstrated persistent filling of the aneurysm dome and the outside institution chose treatment with an endovascular flow diverter, the PED. In the periprocedural period, the patient suffered a left-sided intracranial haemorrhage resulting in right-sided hemiplegia and global aphasia. In the setting of intracerebral haemorrhage, the patient’s dual antiplatelet medications were discontinued.

    After returning to the USA, the patient continued to decline neurologically, developing left-sided dense hemiparesis over the course of several months. The family brought the patient to our institution with limited records and no preprocedural imaging. New cerebral angiography demonstrated occlusion of the distal intracranial left ICA terminating in the persistent giant PCoA aneurysm (figure 1A). In addition, the PCoA aneurysm also filled during posterior circulation injections (figure 1B and C). Direct compression of the aneurysm on the descending corticospinal tracts in the brainstem was believed to be the cause of the patient’s subacute contralateral neurological decline and warranted treatment (figure 2). A temporary balloon occlusion test of the left ICA revealed adequate collateral filling from the contralateral ICA and the posterior circulation.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Giant, non-ruptured, 50 mm left PCoA aneurysm that persisted after initial endovascular treatment. (A) DSA (lateral view) of left internal carotid artery demonstrating partial filling of a persistent giant PCoA aneurysm treated first with stent-assisted coiling followed by flow diversion with the pipeline embolisation device. (B) DSA (lateral view) of left vertebral artery demonstrating partial filling of the aneurysm from the posterior circulation in mid-arterial (B) and late-arterial (C) phases. DSA, digital subtraction angiogram; PCoA, posterior communicating artery.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    MRI reveals a mass lesion with brainstem compression. Axial cranial T2 MRI demonstrating a partially thrombosed persistent giant PCoA aneurysm causing brainstem compression. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PCoA, posterior communicating artery.

    A combined endovascular and microsurgical approach was chosen to address the residual aneurysm with goals to decompress the mass effect of the giant aneurysm and secure the dome. Initial endovascular coil occlusion of the left ICA was performed. The following day, a left modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy was performed to isolate the aneurysm sac from the posterior communicating artery PCoA (posterior communicating artery) and decompress the sac. Visualisation of the aneurysm dome revealed parasitised pial vessels. The aneurysm dome was debulked revealing multiple embolisation coils, associated thrombus and the prior PED was visualised in the parent ICA (figure 3). After coil removal, the neck of the aneurysm was visualised from the inside and clipped inside-out. A micro-Doppler was used intraoperatively to confirm that the residual aneurysm dome demonstrated no residual filling from either the ICA or the PCoA. Postoperative angiogram confirmed no residual aneurysm filling from either anterior or posterior circulation (figure 4A and B) and delayed postoperative MRI demonstrated significant decompression of the brainstem (figure 5).

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Microsurgical aneurysm debulking and clipping following endovascular coil occlusion of left internal carotid artery for treatment of a persistent giant PCoA aneurysm. Intraoperative image with the pipeline embolisation device flow diverter visualised through the debulked PCoA aneurysm dome. PCoA, posterior communicating artery.

    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Postoperative cerebral angiography following endovascular coiling of the left internal carotid artery and microsurgical aneurysm debulking and clipping of a giant left PCoA aneurysm. Postoperative angiography of the (A) right lateral internal carotid artery and (B) vertebral artery cerebral demonstrating complete occlusion of the giant PCoA aneurysm. PCoA, posterior communicating artery.

    Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Delayed postoperative MRI following endovascular coiling of the left internal carotid artery and microsurgical aneurysm debulking and clipping of a giant left PCoA aneurysm. Delayed postoperative axial T2 MRI demonstrating the residual coil mass in a thrombosed giant PCoA aneurysm, with significant reduction in brainstem compression compared with preoperative MRI. Artifact from coil mass and aneurysm clips. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PCoA, posterior communicating artery.

    The patient recovered from this surgery without any new focal neurological deficits and was discharged from the hospital on post-operative day 14. At the time of discharge, the patient was awake and alert with continued right-sided hemiplegia and global aphasia, and improvement in left-sided strength from dense hemiparesis to attempted localisation with noxious stimulation. The patient was last evaluated in the clinic 36 months postoperatively and has continued to improve. Currently, the left-sided strength is 4/5 in all muscle groups and the right leg has regained strength proximally to 3/5 power. The patient follows commands and attempts to vocalise words.

    Discussion

    Giant aneurysms, notably supergiant aneurysms (>50 mm), represent complicated dome histopathology and a single surgical modality may not be sufficient to address the various disease components. Open microsurgery lends to immediate dome occlusion but may be fraught with high morbidity.45 46 48 51 52 In contrast, conventional endovascular treatment with endosaccular coil embolisation is associated with known risks of recurrence, whereas parent vessel remodelling through flow diversion with delayed complete aneurysm occlusion can lead to aneurysm growth.39 53 Additionally, a curative result from flow diversion treatment of the more fusiform and supergiant aneurysms becomes limited given the challenges of achieving endothelialisation along a longer length of device construct without a wall. The management of complex residuum or recurrences in giant aneurysms can be particularly challenging with conventional microsurgical and endovascular techniques.34 37 54

    A combination approach of endovascular and open microvascular techniques may more adequately address the precarious situation of partial aneurysm thrombosis and the complex histology of parasitised giant aneurysm domes. Such an approach may allow for greater total occlusion rates and better patient outcomes. Specifically, the debulking of the aneurysm dome can limit its mass effect on surrounding critical structures. Both patient-specific and surgeon-specific factors must be considered in the context of each individual case to determine the most appropriate intervention.

    In the aforementioned case illustration, the giant PCoA aneurysm persisted following stent-assisted coiling and treatment with the PED flow diverter. Given the patient’s worsening neurological examination and imaging suggestive of direct aneurysmal compression on the brainstem, a combined endovascular and microsurgical approach was undertaken that included ICA coil sacrifice followed by debulking of the aneurysm dome and internal clipping. This combination approach, rather than a single surgical modality, was chosen to address both curative aneurysm occlusion and the vasculopathology of aneurysm dome parasitisation.

    Ding et al reported a similar case in which a giant posterior cerebral artery aneurysm persisted following endovascular treatment with two PEDs. However, in that case, the aneurysm’s continued growth led to obstructive hydrocephalus. An open microsurgical approach was then taken to secure and decompress the aneurysm dome. Following surgery, postoperative venous infarcts occurred, which lead to a complicated postoperative course and death.55

    There are several reports in the literature of combined concomitant endovascular and microsurgical interventions for giant intracranial aneurysm.45 46 48–50 Reported techniques include selective revascularisation and aneurysm occlusion, endovascular and surgical trapping, EC-IC bypass with parent vessel occlusion, flow redirection, or arterial transposition, intraoperative temporary balloon occlusion with aneurysm clipping, clipping after attempted or incomplete coiling, and coiling after attempted or incomplete clipping. These reports have yielded overall promising results (table 1).

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Literature review of giant intracranial aneurysms treated with combined concomitant endovascular and microsurgical interventions.

    Conclusions

    No single approach may be the panacea for giant and particularly super-giant intracranial aneurysms. As microsurgical and endovascular techniques continue to refine, evidence suggests multimodal evaluation and treatment warrants greater consideration for these select cases often with distinct histopathology where the aneurysm dome harbours parasitised pia vessels. Our case example demonstrates a successful combined approach in a patient with multiple failed endovascular attempts of treating a supergiant intracranial aneurysm. This case may serve as a basis for further investigation of multimodal management of difficult to treat supergiant aneurysms.

    References

    1. ↵
      2. Austin G ,
      3. Fisher S ,
      4. Dickson D , et al
      . The significance of the extracellular matrix in intracranial aneurysms. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1993;23:97–105.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      2. Stehbens WE
      . Histopathology of cerebral aneurysms. Arch Neurol 1963;8:272–85.doi:10.1001/archneur.1963.00460030056005
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      2. Katayama Y ,
      3. Tsubokawa T ,
      4. Miyazaki S , et al
      . Growth of totally thrombosed giant aneurysm within the posterior cranial fossa. Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Neuroradiology 1991;33:168–70.doi:10.1007/bf00588260
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      2. Du Boulay GH
      . Some observations on the natural history of intracranial aneurysms. Br J Radiol 1965;38:721–57.doi:10.1259/0007-1285-38-454-721
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      2. Pia HW ,
      3. Zierski J
      . Giant cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev 1982;5:117–48.doi:10.1007/BF01742676
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      2. Schubiger O ,
      3. Valavanis A ,
      4. Wichmann W
      . Growth-mechanism of giant intracranial aneurysms; demonstration by CT and MR imaging. Neuroradiology 1987;29:266–71.doi:10.1007/BF00451765
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      2. Sekhar LN ,
      3. Heros RC
      . Origin, growth, and rupture of saccular aneurysms: a review. Neurosurgery 1981;8:248–60.doi:10.1227/00006123-198102000-00020
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      2. Wright JM ,
      3. Huang CL ,
      4. Sharma R , et al
      . Cardiac standstill and circulatory flow arrest in surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E10.doi:10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13554
    9. ↵
      2. Cantore G ,
      3. Santoro A ,
      4. Guidetti G , et al
      . Surgical treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms: current viewpoint. Neurosurgery 2008;63:279–89. discussion 89-90.doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000313122.58694.91
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      2. Gewirtz RJ ,
      3. Awad IA
      . Giant aneurysms of the anterior circle of Willis: management outcome of open microsurgical treatment. Surg Neurol 1996;45:409–21. discussion 20-1.doi:10.1016/0090-3019(95)00437-8
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      2. Huang L ,
      3. Feng W ,
      4. Qi S
      . [Microsurgical management of intracranial giant aneurysms]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2012;32:1214–7.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    12. ↵
      2. Nanda A ,
      3. Sonig A ,
      4. Banerjee AD , et al
      . Microsurgical management of giant intracranial aneurysms: a single surgeon experience from Louisiana state University, Shreveport. World Neurosurg 2014;81:752–64.doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.010
      OpenUrl
    13. ↵
      2. Sekhar LN ,
      3. Tariq F ,
      4. Mai JC , et al
      . Unyielding progress: treatment paradigms for giant aneurysms. Clin Neurosurg 2012;59:6–21.doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182698b75
      OpenUrlPubMed
    14. ↵
      2. Javedan SP ,
      3. Deshmukh VR ,
      4. Spetzler RF , et al
      . The role of cerebral revascularization in patients with intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2001;12:541–55.doi:10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30042-1
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      2. Spetzler RF ,
      3. Fukushima T ,
      4. Martin N , et al
      . Petrous carotid-to-intradural carotid saphenous vein graft for intracavernous giant aneurysm, tumor, and occlusive cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 1990;73:496–501.doi:10.3171/jns.1990.73.4.0496
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      2. Spetzler RF ,
      3. Roski RA ,
      4. Schuster H , et al
      . The role of EC-IC in the treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurol Res 1980;2:345–59.doi:10.1080/01616412.1980.11739587
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      2. Spetzler RF ,
      3. Schuster H ,
      4. Roski RA
      . Elective extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass in the treatment of inoperable giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1980;53:22–7.doi:10.3171/jns.1980.53.1.0022
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      2. Spetzler RF ,
      3. Selman W ,
      4. Carter LP
      . Elective EC-IC bypass for unclippable intracranial aneurysms. Neurol Res 1984;6:64–8.doi:10.1080/01616412.1984.11739666
      OpenUrlPubMed
    19. ↵
      2. Kato Y ,
      3. Sano H ,
      4. Imizu S , et al
      . Surgical strategies for treatment of giant or large intracranial aneurysms: our experience with 139 cases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003;46:339–43.doi:10.1055/s-2003-812499
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      2. Sughrue ME ,
      3. Saloner D ,
      4. Rayz VL , et al
      . Giant intracranial aneurysms: evolution of management in a contemporary surgical series. Neurosurgery 2011;69:1261–71.doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822bb8a6
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      2. Lawton MT ,
      3. Raudzens PA ,
      4. Zabramski JM , et al
      . Hypothermic circulatory arrest in neurovascular surgery: evolving indications and predictors of patient outcome. Neurosurgery 1998;43:10–20.doi:10.1097/00006123-199807000-00009
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      2. Mack WJ ,
      3. Ducruet AF ,
      4. Angevine PD , et al
      . Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for complex cerebral aneurysms: lessons learned. Neurosurgery 2008;62:815–27.doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000333796.21468.0F
      OpenUrl
    23. ↵
      2. Whisenant JT ,
      3. Kadkhodayan Y ,
      4. Cross DT , et al
      . Incidence and mechanisms of stroke after permanent carotid artery occlusion following temporary occlusion testing. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:395–401.doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011207
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      2. Arambepola PK ,
      3. McEvoy SD ,
      4. Bulsara KR
      . De novo aneurysm formation after carotid artery occlusion for cerebral aneurysms. Skull Base 2010;20:405–8.doi:10.1055/s-0030-1253578
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      2. Chalouhi N ,
      3. Tjoumakaris S ,
      4. Gonzalez LF , et al
      . Coiling of large and giant aneurysms: complications and long-term results of 334 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:546–52.doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3696
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      2. Horowitz M ,
      3. Purdy P ,
      4. Kopitnik T , et al
      . Aneurysm retreatment after Guglielmi detachable coil and nondetachable coil embolization: report of nine cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1999;44:712–9. discussion 9-20.doi:10.1097/00006123-199904000-00013
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    27. ↵
      2. Hasan DM ,
      3. Nadareyshvili AI ,
      4. Hoppe AL , et al
      . Cerebral aneurysm sac growth as the etiology of recurrence after successful coil embolization. Stroke 2012;43:866–8.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.637827
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    28. ↵
      2. Fernandez Zubillaga A ,
      3. Guglielmi G ,
      4. Viñuela F , et al
      . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–20.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      2. Bendok BR ,
      3. Parkinson RJ ,
      4. Hage ZA , et al
      . The effect of vascular reconstruction device-assisted coiling on packing density, effective neck coverage, and angiographic outcome: an in vitro study. Neurosurgery 2007;61:835–41.doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000298913.24625.26
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      2. Samaniego EA ,
      3. Mendez AA ,
      4. Nguyen TN , et al
      . LVIS Jr device for y-stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter experience. Interv Neurol 2018;7:271–83.doi:10.1159/000487545
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      2. Wang J ,
      3. Vargas J ,
      4. Spiotta A , et al
      . Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center clinical and angiographic analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:687–92.doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013272
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    32. ↵
      2. Ciccio G ,
      3. Robert T ,
      4. Smajda S , et al
      . Double stent assisted coiling of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms in Y and X configurations with the Neuroform atlas stent: immediate and mid term angiographic and clinical follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1239–42.doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015175
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    33. ↵
      2. Spiotta AM ,
      3. Derdeyn CP ,
      4. Tateshima S , et al
      . Results of the answer trial using the PulseRider for the treatment of broad-necked, bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2017;81:56–65.doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx085
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      2. Jiang B ,
      3. Paff M ,
      4. Colby GP , et al
      . Cerebral aneurysm treatment: modern neurovascular techniques. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2016;1:93–100.doi:10.1136/svn-2016-000027
      OpenUrl
    35. ↵
      2. Colby GP ,
      3. Bender MT ,
      4. Lin L-M , et al
      . Declining complication rates with flow diversion of anterior circulation aneurysms after introduction of the pipeline flex: analysis of a single-institution series of 568 cases. J Neurosurg 2018;129:1475–81.doi:10.3171/2017.7.JNS171289
      OpenUrl
    36. ↵
      2. Colby GP ,
      3. Lin L-M ,
      4. Caplan JM , et al
      . Immediate procedural outcomes in 44 consecutive pipeline flex cases: the first North American single-center series. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:702–9.doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011894
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      2. Becske T ,
      3. Brinjikji W ,
      4. Potts MB , et al
      . Long-Term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for Uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–8.doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    38. ↵
      2. Becske T ,
      3. Kallmes DF ,
      4. Saatci I , et al
      . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68.doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    39. ↵
      2. Bender MT ,
      3. Colby GP ,
      4. Lin L-M , et al
      . Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg 2018;130:259–67.doi:10.3171/2017.11.JNS171738
      OpenUrl
    40. ↵
      2. De Vries J ,
      3. Boogaarts J ,
      4. Van Norden A , et al
      . New generation of flow Diverter (surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    41. ↵
      2. Wakhloo AK ,
      3. Lylyk P ,
      4. de Vries J , et al
      . Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:98–107.doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4078
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    42. ↵
      2. Meyers PM ,
      3. Coon AL ,
      4. Kan PT , et al
      . Scent trial.. Stroke 2019;50:1473–9.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024135
      OpenUrlPubMed
    43. ↵
      2. Colby GP ,
      3. Lin L-M ,
      4. Caplan JM , et al
      . Flow diversion of large internal carotid artery aneurysms with the surpass device: impressions and technical nuance from the initial North American experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:279–86.doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011769
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    44. ↵
      2. Taschner CA ,
      3. Vedantham S ,
      4. de Vries J , et al
      . Surpass flow Diverter for treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:582–9.doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5029
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    45. ↵
      2. Arnautović KI ,
      3. Al-Mefty O ,
      4. Angtuaco E
      . A combined microsurgical skull-base and endovascular approach to giant and large paraclinoid aneurysms. Surg Neurol 1998;50:504–20.doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(97)80415-6
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    46. ↵
      2. Lawton MT ,
      3. Quinones-Hinojosa A ,
      4. Sanai N , et al
      . Combined microsurgical and endovascular management of complex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;62:263–75.doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000333814.02649.A0
      OpenUrl
    47. ↵
      2. Lin L-M ,
      3. Iyer RR ,
      4. Bender MT , et al
      . Rescue treatment with pipeline embolization for postsurgical clipping recurrences of anterior communicating artery region aneurysms. Interv Neurol 2017;6:135–46.doi:10.1159/000460264
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    48. ↵
      2. Ponce FA ,
      3. Albuquerque FC ,
      4. McDougall CG , et al
      . Combined endovascular and microsurgical management of giant and complex unruptured aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:1–7.doi:10.3171/foc.2004.17.5.11
      OpenUrl
    49. ↵
      2. Serbinenko FA ,
      3. Filatov JM ,
      4. Spallone A , et al
      . Management of giant intracranial ICA aneurysms with combined extracranial-intracranial anastomosis and endovascular occlusion. J Neurosurg 1990;73:57–63.doi:10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0057
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    50. ↵
      2. Hoh BL ,
      3. Putman CM ,
      4. Budzik RF , et al
      . Combined surgical and endovascular techniques of flow alteration to treat fusiform and complex wide-necked intracranial aneurysms that are unsuitable for clipping or coil embolization. J Neurosurg 2001;95:24–35.doi:10.3171/jns.2001.95.1.0024
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    51. ↵
      2. Kerezoudis P ,
      3. McCutcheon BA ,
      4. Murphy M , et al
      . Predictors of 30-day perioperative morbidity and mortality of unruptured intracranial aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;149:75–80.doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.07.027
      OpenUrl
    52. ↵
      2. Shakur SF ,
      3. Carlson AP ,
      4. Harris D , et al
      . Rupture after bypass and distal occlusion of giant anterior circulation aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2017;105:1040.e7–1040.e13.doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.153
      OpenUrl
    53. ↵
      2. Hampton T ,
      3. Walsh D ,
      4. Tolias C , et al
      . Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:167–71.doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.002873
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    54. ↵
      2. Zanaty M ,
      3. Chalouhi N ,
      4. Starke RM , et al
      . Failure of the pipeline embolization device in posterior communicating artery aneurysms associated with a fetal posterior cerebral artery. Case Rep Vasc Med 2016;2016:1–4.doi:10.1155/2016/4691275
      OpenUrl
    55. ↵
      2. Ding D ,
      3. Starke RM ,
      4. Liu KC
      . Microsurgical strategies following failed endovascular treatment with the pipeline embolization device: case of a giant posterior cerebral artery aneurysm. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2014;16:26–31.doi:10.7461/jcen.2014.16.1.26
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @drjessicacampos

    • Contributors JKC, BZB, BCII, ASW, AJS and BJH: participated in literature search and drafted the manuscript. FPKH: assisted with patient management. L-ML: conceptualised and critically reviewed the manuscript.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests L-ML is a consultant/proctor for Stryker Neurovascular and a consultant for MicroVention & Cerenovus.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.